[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240304172836.GL403078@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:28:36 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: R SUNDAR <prosunofficial@...il.com>
Cc: jmaloy@...hat.com, ying.xue@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removed blocking_link field description to prevent
kernel doc warning
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 08:13:59PM +0530, R SUNDAR wrote:
> ./net/tipc/socket.c:143: warning: Excess struct member 'blocking_link' description in 'tipc_sock'
>
> Signed-off-by: R SUNDAR <prosunofficial@...il.com>
> ---
> net/tipc/socket.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c
> index bb1118d02f95..7e4135db5816 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/socket.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/socket.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ struct sockaddr_pair {
> * @phdr: preformatted message header used when sending messages
> * @cong_links: list of congested links
> * @publications: list of publications for port
> - * @blocking_link: address of the congested link we are currently sleeping on
> * @pub_count: total # of publications port has made during its lifetime
> * @conn_timeout: the time we can wait for an unresponded setup request
> * @probe_unacked: probe has not received ack yet
Thanks, this looks good.
However, it duplicates a patch accepted upstream in January.
Link: https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/88bf1b8f3c31
--
pw-bot: not-applicable
Powered by blists - more mailing lists