[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240304210514.3412298-11-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:05:10 -0800
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alan Brady <alan.brady@...el.com>,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Krishneil Singh <krishneil.k.singh@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 10/11] idpf: fix minor controlq issues
From: Alan Brady <alan.brady@...el.com>
While we're here improving virtchnl we can include two minor fixes for
the lower level ctrlq flow.
This adds a memory barrier to idpf_post_rx_buffs before we update tail
on the controlq. We should make sure our writes have had a chance to
finish before we tell HW it can touch them.
This also removes some defensive programming in idpf_ctrlq_recv. The
caller should not be using a num_q_msg value of zero or more than the
ring size and it's their responsibility to call functions sanely.
Tested-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Brady <alan.brady@...el.com>
Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <krishneil.k.singh@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq.c
index c7f43d2fcd13..4849590a5591 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_controlq.c
@@ -516,6 +516,8 @@ int idpf_ctlq_post_rx_buffs(struct idpf_hw *hw, struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq,
/* Wrap to end of end ring since current ntp is 0 */
cq->next_to_post = cq->ring_size - 1;
+ dma_wmb();
+
wr32(hw, cq->reg.tail, cq->next_to_post);
}
@@ -546,11 +548,6 @@ int idpf_ctlq_recv(struct idpf_ctlq_info *cq, u16 *num_q_msg,
int err = 0;
u16 i;
- if (*num_q_msg == 0)
- return 0;
- else if (*num_q_msg > cq->ring_size)
- return -EBADR;
-
/* take the lock before we start messing with the ring */
mutex_lock(&cq->cq_lock);
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists