[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e89be898-bcbd-41f9-aaae-037e6f88069e@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 22:33:52 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 04/22] ovpn: add basic interface
creation/destruction/management routines
> +int ovpn_struct_init(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct ovpn_struct *ovpn = netdev_priv(dev);
> + int err;
> +
> + memset(ovpn, 0, sizeof(*ovpn));
Probably not required. When a netdev is created, it should of zeroed
the priv.
> +int ovpn_iface_create(const char *name, enum ovpn_mode mode, struct net *net)
> +{
> + struct net_device *dev;
> + struct ovpn_struct *ovpn;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof(struct ovpn_struct), name, NET_NAME_USER, ovpn_setup);
> +
> + dev_net_set(dev, net);
> +
> + ret = ovpn_struct_init(dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err;
> +
> + ovpn = netdev_priv(dev);
> + ovpn->mode = mode;
> +
> + rtnl_lock();
> +
> + ret = register_netdevice(dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + netdev_dbg(dev, "cannot register interface %s: %d\n", dev->name, ret);
> + rtnl_unlock();
> + goto err;
> + }
> + rtnl_unlock();
> +
> + return ret;
> +
> +err:
> + free_netdev(dev);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void ovpn_iface_destruct(struct ovpn_struct *ovpn, bool unregister_netdev)
> +{
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> + netif_carrier_off(ovpn->dev);
You often see virtual devices turn their carrier off in there
probe/create function, because it is unclear what state it is in after
register_netdevice().
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists