netdev - [PATCH net-next 4/4] mptcp: drop lookup_by_id in lookup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240305-upstream-net-next-20240304-mptcp-misc-cleanup-v1-4-c436ba5e569b@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 12:04:33 +0100
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>, 
 Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/4] mptcp: drop lookup_by_id in lookup_addr

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>

When the lookup_by_id parameter of __lookup_addr() is true, it's the same
as __lookup_addr_by_id(), it can be replaced by __lookup_addr_by_id()
directly. So drop this parameter, let __lookup_addr() only looks up address
on the local address list by comparing addresses in it, not address ids.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 354083b8386f..5c17d39146ea 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -499,15 +499,12 @@ __lookup_addr_by_id(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, unsigned int id)
 }

 static struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *
-__lookup_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, const struct mptcp_addr_info *info,
-	      bool lookup_by_id)
+__lookup_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, const struct mptcp_addr_info *info)
 {
 	struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry;

 	list_for_each_entry(entry, &pernet->local_addr_list, list) {
-		if ((!lookup_by_id &&
-		     mptcp_addresses_equal(&entry->addr, info, entry->addr.port)) ||
-		    (lookup_by_id && entry->addr.id == info->id))
+		if (mptcp_addresses_equal(&entry->addr, info, entry->addr.port))
 			return entry;
 	}
 	return NULL;
@@ -537,7 +534,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk)

 		mptcp_local_address((struct sock_common *)msk->first, &mpc_addr);
 		rcu_read_lock();
-		entry = __lookup_addr(pernet, &mpc_addr, false);
+		entry = __lookup_addr(pernet, &mpc_addr);
 		if (entry) {
 			__clear_bit(entry->addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap);
 			msk->mpc_endpoint_id = entry->addr.id;
@@ -1918,7 +1915,8 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_set_flags(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 		bkup = 1;

 	spin_lock_bh(&pernet->lock);
-	entry = __lookup_addr(pernet, &addr.addr, lookup_by_id);
+	entry = lookup_by_id ? __lookup_addr_by_id(pernet, addr.addr.id) :
+			       __lookup_addr(pernet, &addr.addr);
 	if (!entry) {
 		spin_unlock_bh(&pernet->lock);
 		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "address not found");

-- 
2.43.0