netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] Add support for OPEN Alliance 10BASE-T1x MACPHY Serial Interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <82e1f510-70a7-4a58-87bb-ad2e4e6117e9@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 13:22:23 +0000
From: <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>
To: <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>,
	<Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com>,
	<Pier.Beruto@...emi.com>, <Selvamani.Rajagopal@...emi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] Add support for OPEN Alliance 10BASE-T1x
 MACPHY Serial Interface

On 04/03/24 6:52 pm, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Good day...!
>>
>> Finally we have completed the v3 patch series preparation and planning
>> to post it in the mainline in the next days. FYI, next week (from 11th
>> to 15th March) I will be out of office and will not have access to
>> emails. Again will be back to work on 18th March. Would it be ok for you
>> to post the patch series this week or shall I post it on March 18th? as
>> I will not be able to reply to the comments immediately. Could you
>> please provide your suggestion on this?
> 
> Onsemi are waiting for the new version. So i would suggest you post
> them sooner, not later. If need be, get one of the other Microchip
> developers to post them. If they are posted RFC, the signed-off-by can
> be missing the actual submitter.
> 
>         Andrew
Hi Andrew,

Thank you for your suggestion. We will send out the patches soon and 
will try our level best to reply to the comments as soon as possible.

Best regards,
Parthiban V