netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 05/15] netdev: support binding dma-buf to netdevice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHS8izPhvRDPVHr8mY2FffPCLYjKqaazjy5NFcnJSnLK+CdyCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 12:00:08 -0800
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, 
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>, 
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>, Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>, 
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, 
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, 
	Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, 
	Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, 
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, 
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, 
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, 
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, 
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, 
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, 
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>, 
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, 
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, 
	Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>, Shailend Chand <shailend@...gle.com>, 
	Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@...gle.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, 
	Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>, Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>, 
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Kaiyuan Zhang <kaiyuanz@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 05/15] netdev: support binding dma-buf to netdevice

On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 1:05 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2024, at 03:01, Mina Almasry wrote:
>
> > +int netdev_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int dmabuf_fd,
> > +                    struct netdev_dmabuf_binding **out)
> > +{
> > +     struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding;
> > +     static u32 id_alloc_next;
> > +     struct scatterlist *sg;
> > +     struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> > +     unsigned int sg_idx, i;
> > +     unsigned long virtual;
> > +     int err;
> > +
> > +     if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> > +             return -EPERM;
> > +
> > +     dmabuf = dma_buf_get(dmabuf_fd);
> > +     if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dmabuf))
> > +             return -EBADFD;
>
> You should never need to use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() for a properly
> defined kernel interface. This one should always return an
> error or a valid pointer, so don't check for NULL.
>

Thanks for clarifying. I will convert to IS_ERR().

> > +     binding->attachment = dma_buf_attach(binding->dmabuf, dev->dev.parent);
> > +     if (IS_ERR(binding->attachment)) {
> > +             err = PTR_ERR(binding->attachment);
> > +             goto err_free_id;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     binding->sgt =
> > +             dma_buf_map_attachment(binding->attachment, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > +     if (IS_ERR(binding->sgt)) {
> > +             err = PTR_ERR(binding->sgt);
> > +             goto err_detach;
> > +     }
>
> Should there be a check to verify that this buffer
> is suitable for network data?
>
> In general, dmabuf allows buffers that are uncached or reside
> in MMIO space of another device, but I think this would break
> when you get an skb with those buffers and try to parse the
> data inside of the kernel on architectures where MMIO space
> is not a normal pointer or unaligned access is disallowed on
> uncached data.
>
>         Arnd

A key goal of this patch series is that the kernel does not try to
parse the skb frags that reside in the dma-buf for that precise
reason. This is achieved using patch "net: add support for skbs with
unreadable frags" which disables the kernel touching the payload in
these skbs, and "tcp: RX path for devmem TCP" which implements a uapi
where the kernel hands the data in the dmabuf to the userspace via a
cmsg that gives the user a pointer to the data in the dmabuf (offset +
size).

So really AFACT the only restriction here is that the NIC should be
able to DMA into the dmabuf that we're attaching, and dma_buf_attach()
fails in this scenario so we're covered there.

-- 
Thanks,
Mina