netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] ice: Add switch recipe reusing feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240306070054.094fe4a6@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 07:00:54 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Zou, Steven" <steven.zou@...el.com>
Cc: "Sharma, Mayank" <mayank.sharma@...el.com>,
 "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Staikov, Andrii"
 <andrii.staikov@...el.com>, "Lobakin, Aleksander"
 <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, "Nguyen, Anthony L"
 <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
 "Kitszel, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "Buvaneswaran, Sujai"
 <sujai.buvaneswaran@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] ice: Add switch recipe
 reusing feature

On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 22:55:48 +0800 Zou, Steven wrote:
> > We are seeing following kernel compilation error while compiling next kernel:
> >
> > "error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'struct dpll_pin'"  
> 
> Thanks Mayank!
> The patch does not touch 'stuct dpll_pin', I do not think this is caused 
> by the patch changes.
> And the patch is based on the base-commit: 
> ce1833c065c8c9aec8b147dd682b0ddca8c30071 that I built and loaded the 
> ice.ko successfully before I submitted the patch.
> 
> Hi Tony,
> Do you have any suggestion about this compilation issue?

net-next tree currently has this problem. You can try merging in net
which has the fix (it will propagate to net-next on Thursday). 
Or try changing the compiler, newer Clang and GCC do not generate this
error.