[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240306231518.GA589712@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 17:15:18 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
horms@...nel.org, pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de,
Alan Brady <alan.brady@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/2] igb: simplify pci ops declaration
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 05:14:12PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Paul for __maybe_unused cleanup]
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 06:50:21PM -0800, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > The igb driver was pre-declaring tons of functions just so that it could
> > have an early declaration of the pci_driver struct.
> >
> > Delete a bunch of the declarations and move the struct to the bottom of the
> > file, after all the functions are declared.
>
> Nice fix, that was always annoying.
>
> Seems like there's an opportunity to drop some of the __maybe_unused
> annotations:
>
> static int __maybe_unused igb_suspend(struct device *dev)
>
> after 1a3c7bb08826 ("PM: core: Add new *_PM_OPS macros, deprecate old ones").
>
> I don't know if SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() makes __maybe_unused unnecessary
> or not.
Sorry, should have read 2/2 first ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists