[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240307145146.GB576211@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 14:51:46 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <radhac@...vell.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sgoutham@...vell.com,
lcherian@...vell.com, gakula@...vell.com, hkelam@...vell.com,
jerinj@...vell.com, sbhatta@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] octeontx2-af: Increase maximum BPID channels
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 01:38:06PM -0800, Radha Mohan Chintakuntla wrote:
> Any NIX interface type can have maximum 256 channels. So increased the
> backpressure ID count to 256 so that it can cover cn9k and cn10k SoCs that
> have different NIX interface types with varied maximum channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <radhac@...vell.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h
> index d5c4f810da61..223a2e39172c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h
> @@ -1207,10 +1207,8 @@ struct nix_bp_cfg_req {
> /* bpid_per_chan = 1 assigns separate bp id for each channel */
> };
>
> -/* PF can be mapped to either CGX or LBK interface,
> - * so maximum 64 channels are possible.
> - */
> -#define NIX_MAX_BPID_CHAN 64
> +/* Maximum channels any single NIX interface can have */
> +#define NIX_MAX_BPID_CHAN 256
> struct nix_bp_cfg_rsp {
> struct mbox_msghdr hdr;
> u16 chan_bpid[NIX_MAX_BPID_CHAN]; /* Channel and bpid mapping */
Hi Radha,
looking over this, I am curious to know how out-of bounds access
to chan_bpid is prevented. The bounds seems to be the
the number of PF or VF rings. Which I assume is derived from
the HW. But if so, what if the HW reports more than NIX_MAX_BPID_CHAN
rings?
On a different note, struct includes the following field:
u16 bpid[NIX_MAX_BPID_CHAN];
But here the index used seems to be
1. VLAN priority (which has maximum value of 8) if DCB is used
2. 0 otherwise
So perhaps fewer elements are needed?
Apologies in advance if I'm on the wrong track here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists