[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZennTrYTqsPHylmQ@boxer>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:11:58 +0100
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Robert
Elliott" <elliott@....com>, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "David
S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub
Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Michal Swiatkowski
<michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v1] ice: fix bug with suspend and rebuild
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 05:33:50PM -0800, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On 3/6/2024 8:56 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > > > Fixes: b3e7b3a6ee92 ("ice: prevent NULL pointer deref during reload")
> > > > Reported-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@....com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> > >
> > > Well, that refactor of config path introduced lots of issues. Could
> > > validation folks include a short list of tests they tried out against
> > > tested patch?
> >
> > Sorry, I got confused and now I saw the same thing Simon pointed out.
>
> Thanks, NP! this thread is for v1, and v2 is already posted with the
> refactor just moving the CONFIG_FOO in patch 1, and then the real final
> version of the fix in v2 patch two which switches all the intel drivers over
> to the new macros.
>
> >
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> > > > index 097bf8fd6bf0..0f5a92a6b1e6 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> > > > @@ -3238,7 +3238,7 @@ int ice_vsi_rebuild(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u32 vsi_flags)
> > > > {
> > > > struct ice_vsi_cfg_params params = {};
> > > > struct ice_coalesce_stored *coalesce;
> >
> > struct ice_coalesce_stored *coalesce __free(kfree);
>
> Yes, but not in a "fix" patch for -net. I figure this is more of a refactor
> kind of thing, so will not include it in this change.
I suppose that's because older kernels might not have this construct
backported, so yeah your v2 is good as-is.
>
> >
> > ?
> >
> > and drop explicit kfree()s altogether?
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists