[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240307221122.2094511-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 14:11:22 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
hawk@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] ynl: samples: fix recycling rate calculation
Running the page-pool sample on production machines under moderate
networking load shows recycling rate higher than 100%:
$ page-pool
eth0[2] page pools: 14 (zombies: 0)
refs: 89088 bytes: 364904448 (refs: 0 bytes: 0)
recycling: 100.3% (alloc: 1392:2290247724 recycle: 469289484:1828235386)
Note that outstanding refs (89088) == slow alloc * cache size (1392 * 64)
which means this machine is recycling page pool pages perfectly, not
a single page has been released.
The extra 0.3% is because sample ignores allocations from the ptr_ring.
Treat those the same as alloc_fast, the ring vs cache alloc is
already captured accurately enough by recycling stats.
With the fix:
$ page-pool
eth0[2] page pools: 14 (zombies: 0)
refs: 89088 bytes: 364904448 (refs: 0 bytes: 0)
recycling: 100.0% (alloc: 1392:2331141604 recycle: 473625579:1857460661)
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
CC: hawk@...nel.org
---
tools/net/ynl/samples/page-pool.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/net/ynl/samples/page-pool.c b/tools/net/ynl/samples/page-pool.c
index 098b5190d0e5..332f281ee5cb 100644
--- a/tools/net/ynl/samples/page-pool.c
+++ b/tools/net/ynl/samples/page-pool.c
@@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
if (pp->_present.alloc_fast)
s->alloc_fast += pp->alloc_fast;
+ if (pp->_present.alloc_refill)
+ s->alloc_fast += pp->alloc_refill;
if (pp->_present.alloc_slow)
s->alloc_slow += pp->alloc_slow;
if (pp->_present.recycle_ring)
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists