[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80fee2d0-356b-4baf-bd7a-b338df3644fa@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:52:39 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: realtek: describe
LED usage
> + properties:
> + reg:
> + description:
> + "reg indicates the LED group for this LED"
> + enum: [0, 1, 2, 3]
Having read the code, i don't think the binding needs to say anything
about the group. It is implicit. Port LED 0 is in group 0. Port LED 1
is in group 1. So there is nothing here which is outside of the
standard LED binding. So as Linus said, i don't think you need any
YAML at all, the DSA port binding should be sufficient.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists