[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ze8szTcH9jHR4fgw@nanopsycho>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 17:09:49 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, kuba@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, andrew@...n.ch, victor.raj@...el.com,
michal.wilczynski@...el.com, lukasz.czapnik@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v6 5/6] ice: Add
tx_scheduling_layers devlink param
Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 01:49:37PM CET, mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com wrote:
>
>
>On 3/11/2024 9:17 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 11:16:25AM CET, mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 3/6/2024 9:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > > Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 03:39:41PM CET, mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com wrote:
>> > > > From: Lukasz Czapnik <lukasz.czapnik@...el.com>
>> > > >
>> > > > It was observed that Tx performance was inconsistent across all queues
>> > > > and/or VSIs and that it was directly connected to existing 9-layer
>> > > > topology of the Tx scheduler.
>> > > >
>> > > > Introduce new private devlink param - tx_scheduling_layers. This parameter
>> > > > gives user flexibility to choose the 5-layer transmit scheduler topology
>> > > > which helps to smooth out the transmit performance.
>> > > >
>> > > > Allowed parameter values are 5 and 9.
>> > > >
>> > > > Example usage:
>> > > >
>> > > > Show:
>> > > > devlink dev param show pci/0000:4b:00.0 name tx_scheduling_layers
>> > > > pci/0000:4b:00.0:
>> > > > name tx_scheduling_layers type driver-specific
>> > > > values:
>> > > > cmode permanent value 9
>> > > >
>> > > > Set:
>> > > > devlink dev param set pci/0000:4b:00.0 name tx_scheduling_layers value 5
>> > > > cmode permanent
>> > > >
>> > > > devlink dev param set pci/0000:4b:00.0 name tx_scheduling_layers value 9
>> > > > cmode permanent
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Czapnik <lukasz.czapnik@...el.com>
>> > > > Co-developed-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>
>> > > > ---
>> > > > .../net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adminq_cmd.h | 9 +
>> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++-
>> > > > .../net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fw_update.c | 7 +-
>> > > > .../net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fw_update.h | 3 +
>> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.c | 7 +-
>> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.h | 3 +
>> > > > 6 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> > > >
>> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adminq_cmd.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adminq_cmd.h
>> > > > index 0487c425ae24..e76c388b9905 100644
>> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adminq_cmd.h
>> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_adminq_cmd.h
>> > > > @@ -1684,6 +1684,15 @@ struct ice_aqc_nvm {
>> > > >
>> > > > #define ICE_AQC_NVM_START_POINT 0
>> > > >
>> > > > +#define ICE_AQC_NVM_TX_TOPO_MOD_ID 0x14B
>> > > > +
>> > > > +struct ice_aqc_nvm_tx_topo_user_sel {
>> > > > + __le16 length;
>> > > > + u8 data;
>> > > > +#define ICE_AQC_NVM_TX_TOPO_USER_SEL BIT(4)
>> > > > + u8 reserved;
>> > > > +};
>> > > > +
>> > > > /* NVM Checksum Command (direct, 0x0706) */
>> > > > struct ice_aqc_nvm_checksum {
>> > > > u8 flags;
>> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
>> > > > index c0a89a1b4e88..f94793db460c 100644
>> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
>> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c
>> > > > @@ -770,6 +770,168 @@ ice_devlink_port_unsplit(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_port *port,
>> > > > return ice_devlink_port_split(devlink, port, 1, extack);
>> > > > }
>> > > >
>> > > > +/**
>> > > > + * ice_get_tx_topo_user_sel - Read user's choice from flash
>> > > > + * @pf: pointer to pf structure
>> > > > + * @layers: value read from flash will be saved here
>> > > > + *
>> > > > + * Reads user's preference for Tx Scheduler Topology Tree from PFA TLV.
>> > > > + *
>> > > > + * Returns zero when read was successful, negative values otherwise.
>> > > > + */
>> > > > +static int ice_get_tx_topo_user_sel(struct ice_pf *pf, uint8_t *layers)
>> > > > +{
>> > > > + struct ice_aqc_nvm_tx_topo_user_sel usr_sel = {};
>> > > > + struct ice_hw *hw = &pf->hw;
>> > > > + int err;
>> > > > +
>> > > > + err = ice_acquire_nvm(hw, ICE_RES_READ);
>> > > > + if (err)
>> > > > + return err;
>> > > > +
>> > > > + err = ice_aq_read_nvm(hw, ICE_AQC_NVM_TX_TOPO_MOD_ID, 0,
>> > > > + sizeof(usr_sel), &usr_sel, true, true, NULL);
>> > > > + if (err)
>> > > > + goto exit_release_res;
>> > > > +
>> > > > + if (usr_sel.data & ICE_AQC_NVM_TX_TOPO_USER_SEL)
>> > > > + *layers = ICE_SCHED_5_LAYERS;
>> > > > + else
>> > > > + *layers = ICE_SCHED_9_LAYERS;
>> > > > +
>> > > > +exit_release_res:
>> > > > + ice_release_nvm(hw);
>> > > > +
>> > > > + return err;
>> > > > +}
>> > > > +
>> > > > +/**
>> > > > + * ice_update_tx_topo_user_sel - Save user's preference in flash
>> > > > + * @pf: pointer to pf structure
>> > > > + * @layers: value to be saved in flash
>> > > > + *
>> > > > + * Variable "layers" defines user's preference about number of layers in Tx
>> > > > + * Scheduler Topology Tree. This choice should be stored in PFA TLV field
>> > > > + * and be picked up by driver, next time during init.
>> > > > + *
>> > > > + * Returns zero when save was successful, negative values otherwise.
>> > > > + */
>> > > > +static int ice_update_tx_topo_user_sel(struct ice_pf *pf, int layers)
>> > > > +{
>> > > > + struct ice_aqc_nvm_tx_topo_user_sel usr_sel = {};
>> > > > + struct ice_hw *hw = &pf->hw;
>> > > > + int err;
>> > > > +
>> > > > + err = ice_acquire_nvm(hw, ICE_RES_WRITE);
>> > > > + if (err)
>> > > > + return err;
>> > > > +
>> > > > + err = ice_aq_read_nvm(hw, ICE_AQC_NVM_TX_TOPO_MOD_ID, 0,
>> > > > + sizeof(usr_sel), &usr_sel, true, true, NULL);
>> > > > + if (err)
>> > > > + goto exit_release_res;
>> > > > +
>> > > > + if (layers == ICE_SCHED_5_LAYERS)
>> > > > + usr_sel.data |= ICE_AQC_NVM_TX_TOPO_USER_SEL;
>> > > > + else
>> > > > + usr_sel.data &= ~ICE_AQC_NVM_TX_TOPO_USER_SEL;
>> > > > +
>> > > > + err = ice_write_one_nvm_block(pf, ICE_AQC_NVM_TX_TOPO_MOD_ID, 2,
>> > > > + sizeof(usr_sel.data), &usr_sel.data,
>> > > > + true, NULL, NULL);
>> > > > + if (err)
>> > > > + err = -EIO;
>> > >
>> > > Just return err. ice_write_one_nvm_block() seems to return it always
>> > > in case of an error.
>> > >
>> > > pw-bot: cr
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > +
>> > > > +exit_release_res:
>> > > > + ice_release_nvm(hw);
>> > > > +
>> > > > + return err;
>> > > > +}
>> > > > +
>> > > > +/**
>> > > > + * ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_get - Get tx_scheduling_layers parameter
>> > > > + * @devlink: pointer to the devlink instance
>> > > > + * @id: the parameter ID to set
>> > > > + * @ctx: context to store the parameter value
>> > > > + *
>> > > > + * Returns zero on success and negative value on failure.
>> > > > + */
>> > > > +static int ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_get(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id,
>> > > > + struct devlink_param_gset_ctx *ctx)
>> > > > +{
>> > > > + struct ice_pf *pf = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> > > > + int err;
>> > > > +
>> > > > + err = ice_get_tx_topo_user_sel(pf, &ctx->val.vu8);
>> > > > + if (err)
>> > > > + return -EIO;
>> > >
>> > > Why you return -EIO and not just "err". ice_get_tx_topo_user_sel() seems
>> > > to return proper -EXX values.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > +
>> > > > + return 0;
>> > > > +}
>> > > > +
>> > > > +/**
>> > > > + * ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_set - Set tx_scheduling_layers parameter
>> > > > + * @devlink: pointer to the devlink instance
>> > > > + * @id: the parameter ID to set
>> > > > + * @ctx: context to get the parameter value
>> > > > + * @extack: netlink extended ACK structure
>> > > > + *
>> > > > + * Returns zero on success and negative value on failure.
>> > > > + */
>> > > > +static int ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_set(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id,
>> > > > + struct devlink_param_gset_ctx *ctx,
>> > > > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > > > +{
>> > > > + struct ice_pf *pf = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> > > > + int err;
>> > > > +
>> > > > + err = ice_update_tx_topo_user_sel(pf, ctx->val.vu8);
>> > > > + if (err)
>> > > > + return -EIO;
>> > >
>> > > Why you return -EIO and not just "err". ice_update_tx_topo_user_sel() seems
>> > > to return proper -EXX values.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > +
>> > > > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
>> > > > + "Tx scheduling layers have been changed on this device. You must do the PCI slot powercycle for the change to take effect.");
>> > > > +
>> > > > + return 0;
>> > > > +}
>> > > > +
>> > > > +/**
>> > > > + * ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_validate - Validate passed tx_scheduling_layers
>> > > > + * parameter value
>> > > > + * @devlink: unused pointer to devlink instance
>> > > > + * @id: the parameter ID to validate
>> > > > + * @val: value to validate
>> > > > + * @extack: netlink extended ACK structure
>> > > > + *
>> > > > + * Supported values are:
>> > > > + * - 5 - five layers Tx Scheduler Topology Tree
>> > > > + * - 9 - nine layers Tx Scheduler Topology Tree
>> > > > + *
>> > > > + * Returns zero when passed parameter value is supported. Negative value on
>> > > > + * error.
>> > > > + */
>> > > > +static int ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_validate(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id,
>> > > > + union devlink_param_value val,
>> > > > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > > > +{
>> > > > + struct ice_pf *pf = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> > > > + struct ice_hw *hw = &pf->hw;
>> > > > +
>> > > > + if (!hw->func_caps.common_cap.tx_sched_topo_comp_mode_en) {
>> > > > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
>> > > > + "Requested feature is not supported by the FW on this device.");
>> > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> > >
>> > > Why can't you only return this param in case hw->func_caps.common_cap.tx_sched_topo_comp_mode_en
>> > > is true? Then you don't need this check.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > Hmm... This comment is not really clear for me, I do not see the opportunity
>> > to change that now. I want to stay with both checks, to verify if capability
>> > is set and if user passed the correct number of layers
>>
>> My point is, during param register, you know if this param is supported
>> or not. Why don't you check hw->func_caps.common_cap.tx_sched_topo_comp_mode_en
>> and register this param only if it is true?
>>
>>
>
>I see now. Okay, I will simplify that and I will send new version
>tomorrow.
>On the other hand I plan to send other series for devlink soon. That
>will include an enhancement to check similar stuff in drivers in more
>convenient way.
https://patchwork.hopto.org/net-next.html
>
>> >
>> > > > + }
>> > > > +
>> > > > + if (val.vu8 != ICE_SCHED_5_LAYERS && val.vu8 != ICE_SCHED_9_LAYERS) {
>> > > > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
>> > > > + "Wrong number of tx scheduler layers provided.");
>> > > > + return -EINVAL;
>> > > > + }
>> > > > +
>> > > > + return 0;
>> > > > +}
>> > > > +
>> > > > /**
>> > > > * ice_tear_down_devlink_rate_tree - removes devlink-rate exported tree
>> > > > * @pf: pf struct
>> > > > @@ -1478,6 +1640,11 @@ static int ice_devlink_enable_iw_validate(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id,
>> > > > return 0;
>> > > > }
>> > > >
>> > > > +enum ice_param_id {
>> > > > + ICE_DEVLINK_PARAM_ID_BASE = DEVLINK_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_MAX,
>> > > > + ICE_DEVLINK_PARAM_ID_TX_BALANCE,
>> > > > +};
>> > > > +
>> > > > static const struct devlink_param ice_devlink_params[] = {
>> > > > DEVLINK_PARAM_GENERIC(ENABLE_ROCE, BIT(DEVLINK_PARAM_CMODE_RUNTIME),
>> > > > ice_devlink_enable_roce_get,
>> > > > @@ -1487,7 +1654,13 @@ static const struct devlink_param ice_devlink_params[] = {
>> > > > ice_devlink_enable_iw_get,
>> > > > ice_devlink_enable_iw_set,
>> > > > ice_devlink_enable_iw_validate),
>> > > > -
>> > > > + DEVLINK_PARAM_DRIVER(ICE_DEVLINK_PARAM_ID_TX_BALANCE,
>> > > > + "tx_scheduling_layers",
>> > > > + DEVLINK_PARAM_TYPE_U8,
>> > > > + BIT(DEVLINK_PARAM_CMODE_PERMANENT),
>> > > > + ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_get,
>> > > > + ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_set,
>> > > > + ice_devlink_tx_sched_layers_validate),
>> > > > };
>> > > >
>> > > > static void ice_devlink_free(void *devlink_ptr)
>> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fw_update.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fw_update.c
>> > > > index 319a2d6fe26c..f81db6c107c8 100644
>> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fw_update.c
>> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fw_update.c
>> > > > @@ -286,10 +286,9 @@ ice_send_component_table(struct pldmfw *context, struct pldmfw_component *compon
>> > > > *
>> > > > * Returns: zero on success, or a negative error code on failure.
>> > > > */
>> > > > -static int
>> > > > -ice_write_one_nvm_block(struct ice_pf *pf, u16 module, u32 offset,
>> > > > - u16 block_size, u8 *block, bool last_cmd,
>> > > > - u8 *reset_level, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > > > +int ice_write_one_nvm_block(struct ice_pf *pf, u16 module, u32 offset,
>> > > > + u16 block_size, u8 *block, bool last_cmd,
>> > > > + u8 *reset_level, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > > > {
>> > > > u16 completion_module, completion_retval;
>> > > > struct device *dev = ice_pf_to_dev(pf);
>> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fw_update.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fw_update.h
>> > > > index 750574885716..04b200462757 100644
>> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fw_update.h
>> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fw_update.h
>> > > > @@ -9,5 +9,8 @@ int ice_devlink_flash_update(struct devlink *devlink,
>> > > > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> > > > int ice_get_pending_updates(struct ice_pf *pf, u8 *pending,
>> > > > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> > > > +int ice_write_one_nvm_block(struct ice_pf *pf, u16 module, u32 offset,
>> > > > + u16 block_size, u8 *block, bool last_cmd,
>> > > > + u8 *reset_level, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> > > >
>> > > > #endif
>> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.c
>> > > > index d4e05d2cb30c..84eab92dc03c 100644
>> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.c
>> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.c
>> > > > @@ -18,10 +18,9 @@
>> > > > *
>> > > > * Read the NVM using the admin queue commands (0x0701)
>> > > > */
>> > > > -static int
>> > > > -ice_aq_read_nvm(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 module_typeid, u32 offset, u16 length,
>> > > > - void *data, bool last_command, bool read_shadow_ram,
>> > > > - struct ice_sq_cd *cd)
>> > > > +int ice_aq_read_nvm(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 module_typeid, u32 offset,
>> > > > + u16 length, void *data, bool last_command,
>> > > > + bool read_shadow_ram, struct ice_sq_cd *cd)
>> > > > {
>> > > > struct ice_aq_desc desc;
>> > > > struct ice_aqc_nvm *cmd;
>> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.h
>> > > > index 774c2317967d..63cdc6bdac58 100644
>> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.h
>> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.h
>> > > > @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ struct ice_orom_civd_info {
>> > > >
>> > > > int ice_acquire_nvm(struct ice_hw *hw, enum ice_aq_res_access_type access);
>> > > > void ice_release_nvm(struct ice_hw *hw);
>> > > > +int ice_aq_read_nvm(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 module_typeid, u32 offset,
>> > > > + u16 length, void *data, bool last_command,
>> > > > + bool read_shadow_ram, struct ice_sq_cd *cd);
>> > > > int
>> > > > ice_read_flat_nvm(struct ice_hw *hw, u32 offset, u32 *length, u8 *data,
>> > > > bool read_shadow_ram);
>> > > > --
>> > > > 2.38.1
>> > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists