lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f79a26d8-c6d1-43b1-b872-6705417b4101@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:21:18 +0100
From: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org,
 xeb@...l.ru, shuah@...nel.org, idosch@...dia.com, razor@...ckwall.org,
 amcohen@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com, jbenc@...hat.com, bpoirier@...dia.com,
 b.galvani@...il.com, gavinl@...dia.com, liujian56@...wei.com,
 horms@...nel.org, linyunsheng@...wei.com, therbert@...gle.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: gro: move L3 flush checks to
 tcp_gro_receive

Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Richard Gobert wrote:
>> {inet,ipv6}_gro_receive functions perform flush checks (ttl, flags,
>> iph->id, ...) against all packets in a loop. These flush checks are
>> relevant only to tcp flows, and as such they're used to determine whether
>> the packets can be merged later in tcp_gro_receive.
>>
>> These checks are not relevant to UDP packets.
> 
> These are network protocol coalescing invariants. Why would they be
> limited to certain transport protocols only?

Thanks for the review, I'll fix the typos.
I replied to Eric's comment about the relevancy of these checks for UDP.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ