netdev - Re: bonding: Do we need netlink events for LACP status?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 19:44:39 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bonding: Do we need netlink events for LACP status?

On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 07:11:29PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> 	Generally speaking, I don't see an issue with adding these type
> of netlink events, as in normal usage the volume will be low.
> 
> 	Looking at the code, I think it would be a matter of adding the
> new IFLA_BOND_LACP_STUFF labels, updating bond_fill_slave_info() and
> maybe bond_fill_info() to populate the netlink message for those new
> IFLAs.  Add a call to call_netdevice_notifiers() in ad_mux_machine()
> when the state changes, using a new event type that would need to be
> handled by rtnetlink_event().

Thank Jay, I will add this on my todo list.

Hangbin