[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfA+SZwcUFdQssxu@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:36:41 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfrm: Pass UDP encapsulation in TX packet offload
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 01:26:30PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> Is it better?
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> index 653e51ae3964..6346690d5c69 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> @@ -407,7 +407,8 @@ bool xfrm_dev_offload_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x)
> struct xfrm_dst *xdst = (struct xfrm_dst *)dst;
> struct net_device *dev = x->xso.dev;
>
> - if (!x->type_offload)
> + if (!x->type_offload ||
> + (x->xso.type == XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_UNSPECIFIED && x->encap))
> return false;
Yes, that should do it.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists