[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240312233723.2984928-2-dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:37:17 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] rxrpc: Fix use of changed alignment param to page_frag_alloc_align()
Commit 411c5f36805c ("mm/page_alloc: modify page_frag_alloc_align() to
accept align as an argument") changed the way page_frag_alloc_align()
worked, but it didn't fix AF_RXRPC as that use of that allocator function
hadn't been merged yet at the time. Now, when the AFS filesystem is used,
this results in:
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 379 at include/linux/gfp.h:323 rxrpc_alloc_data_txbuf+0x9d/0x2b0 [rxrpc]
Fix this by using __page_frag_alloc_align() instead.
Note that it might be better to use an order-based alignment rather than a
mask-based alignment.
Fixes: 49489bb03a50 ("rxrpc: Do zerocopy using MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and page frags")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
net/rxrpc/txbuf.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c b/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c
index b2a82ab756c2..e0679658d9de 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ struct rxrpc_txbuf *rxrpc_alloc_data_txbuf(struct rxrpc_call *call, size_t data_
total = hoff + sizeof(*whdr) + data_size;
mutex_lock(&call->conn->tx_data_alloc_lock);
- buf = page_frag_alloc_align(&call->conn->tx_data_alloc, total, gfp,
- ~(data_align - 1) & ~(L1_CACHE_BYTES - 1));
+ buf = __page_frag_alloc_align(&call->conn->tx_data_alloc, total, gfp,
+ ~(data_align - 1) & ~(L1_CACHE_BYTES - 1));
mutex_unlock(&call->conn->tx_data_alloc_lock);
if (!buf) {
kfree(txb);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists