netdev - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/9] libbpf: don't free btf if program of multi-link tracing existing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALz3k9jJtxVRmgGM4F-33m1wp=aCShnqdaX+7pZ9UmHwntFgXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:56:21 +0800
From: 梦龙董 <dongmenglong.8@...edance.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eddy Z <eddyz87@...il.com>, 
	Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, 
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, 
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, 
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, 
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>, 
	bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/9] libbpf: don't free btf if
 program of multi-link tracing existing

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 10:13 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:05 PM 梦龙董 <dongmenglong.8@...edance.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > +LIBBPF_API void bpf_object__free_btfs(struct bpf_object *obj);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > It shouldn't be exported.
> > > libbpf should clean it up when bpf_object is freed.
> >
> > Yes, libbpf will clean up the btfs when bpf_object is freed in
> > this commit. And I'm trying to offer a way to early free the btfs
> > by the users manual to reduce the memory usage. Or, the
> > btfs that we opened will keep existing until we close the
> > bpf_object.
> >
> > This is optional, I can remove it if you prefer.
>
> Let's not extend libbpf api unless we really need to.
> bpf_program__attach_trace_multi_opts() and
> *skel*__attach() can probably free them.

That's a good idea! Should we add a "bool free_btf" field
to struct bpf_trace_multi_opts? bpf_program__attach_trace_multi_opts()
can be called multi times for a bpf_object, which has multi bpf
program of type tracing multi-link. Or, can we free the btfs
automatically if we found all tracing multi-link programs are attached?

Thanks!
Menglong Dong

> I don't see a use case where you'd want to keep them afterwards.