netdev - Re: [PATCH V5 net-next 0/4] Support some features for the HNS3 ethernet driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:29:51 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>
Cc: <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>, <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
 <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 <jiri@...nulli.us>, <shenjian15@...wei.com>, <wangjie125@...wei.com>,
 <liuyonglong@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 net-next 0/4] Support some features for the HNS3
 ethernet driver

On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 18:00:40 +0800 Jijie Shao wrote:
> Currently, the hns3 driver does not have the trace
> of the command queue. As a result, it is difficult to
> locate the communication between the driver and firmware.
> Therefore, the trace function of the command queue is
> added in this patch set to facilitate the locating of
> communication problems between the driver and firmware.
> 
> If a RAS occurs, the driver will automatically reset to attempt
> to recover the RAS. Therefore, to locate the cause of the RAS,
> it is necessary to save the values of some RAS-related dfx
> registers before the reset. So we added a patch in
> this patch set to print these information.

## Form letter - net-next-closed

The merge window for v6.9 has begun and we have already posted our pull
request. Therefore net-next is closed for new drivers, features, code
refactoring and optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after March 25th.

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.

See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle
-- 
pw-bot: defer