netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v11 4/9] dt-bindings: net: convert hisi-femac.txt to YAML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <SEZPR06MB69592620693B63B0891CDDB6962B2@SEZPR06MB6959.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:15:27 +0800
From: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
 Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
 <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 4/9] dt-bindings: net: convert hisi-femac.txt
 to YAML

On 3/12/2024 9:08 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:49:21 +0800 Yang Xiwen wrote:
>>>> Still not very correct here. In downstream the core can also have an
>>>> external PHY. The internal phy is also optional. So maybe this clock
>>>> should be optional.
>>> You are responding to yourself 4 min after posting?
>>> What is the purpose of your comments?
>> Just to remind others or myself this can be improved. But i think it's
>> ready to be applied. There won't be similar design in mainline soon i think.
> It's a fairly uncommon thing to do, normally such notes should either
> be comments in the code or notes in the commit message.

Yeah. Maybe i can try to improve this in the next 6 weeks. But without 
the hardware to test, i can hardly say my implementation is correct or not.

>
> In any case - the merge window for v6.9 has started, we won't be able
> to merge these changes for the next 2 weeks :(

It's sad to wait for another 6 weeks till v6.10. But i'm okay with it, 
since i still have a lot of other patches pending to be applied for 
Hi3798MV200 SoC.

-- 
Regards,
Yang Xiwen