[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9fb980b65b8b4bc7c994cdfa1bac72e3f7c5677e.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:43:01 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Florian
Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net: bridge: switchdev: Improve error
message clarity for switchdev_port_obj_add/del_deffered operations
On Sat, 2024-03-09 at 07:32 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Enhance the error reporting mechanism in the switchdev framework to
> provide more informative and user-friendly error messages.
>
> Following feedback from users struggling to understand the implications
> of error messages like "failed (err=-28) to add object (id=2)", this
> update aims to clarify what operation failed and how this might impact
> the system or network.
>
> With this change, error messages now include a description of the failed
> operation, the specific object involved, and a brief explanation of the
> potential impact on the system. This approach helps administrators and
> developers better understand the context and severity of errors,
> facilitating quicker and more effective troubleshooting.
>
> Example of the improved logging:
>
> [ 70.516446] ksz-switch spi0.0 uplink: Failed to add Port Multicast
> Database entry (object id=2) with error: -ENOSPC (-28).
> [ 70.516446] Failure in updating the port's Multicast Database could
> lead to multicast forwarding issues.
> [ 70.516446] Current HW/SW setup lacks sufficient resources.
>
> This comprehensive update includes handling for a range of switchdev
> object IDs, ensuring that most operations within the switchdev framework
> benefit from clearer error reporting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Very minor nit: the reviewed-by tag should come first it that has been
collected before posting the given revision.
More relevantly:
## Form letter - net-next-closed
The merge window for v6.9 has begun and we have already posted our pull
request. Therefore net-next is closed for new drivers, features, code
refactoring and optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes
only.
Please repost when net-next reopens after March 25th.
RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.
See:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle
--
pw-bot: defer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists