[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65f16946cd33e_344ff1294fc@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 04:52:22 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@...cinc.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: kernel@...cinc.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net: Re-use and set mono_delivery_time bit
for userspace tstamp packets
Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 3/1/24 12:13 PM, Abhishek Chauhan wrote:
> > Bridge driver today has no support to forward the userspace timestamp
> > packets and ends up resetting the timestamp. ETF qdisc checks the
> > packet coming from userspace and encounters to be 0 thereby dropping
> > time sensitive packets. These changes will allow userspace timestamps
> > packets to be forwarded from the bridge to NIC drivers.
> >
> > Setting the same bit (mono_delivery_time) to avoid dropping of
> > userspace tstamp packets in the forwarding path.
> >
> > Existing functionality of mono_delivery_time remains unaltered here,
> > instead just extended with userspace tstamp support for bridge
> > forwarding path.
>
> The patch currently broke the bpf selftest test_tc_dtime:
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/8242487344/job/22541746675
>
> In particular, there is a uapi field __sk_buff->tstamp_type which currently has
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO to mean skb->tstamp has the MONO "delivery" time.
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_UNSPEC means everything else (this could be a rx timestamp at
> ingress or a delivery time set by user space).
>
> __sk_buff->tstamp_type depends on skb->mono_delivery_time which does not
> necessarily mean mono after this patch. I thought about fixing it on the bpf
> side such that reading __sk_buff->tstamp_type only returns
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO when the skb->mono_delivery_time is set and skb->sk
> is IPPROTO_TCP. However, it won't work because of bpf_skb_set_tstamp().
>
> There is a bpf helper, bpf_skb_set_tstamp(skb, tstamp,
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO). This helper changes both the skb->tstamp and the
> skb->mono_delivery_time. The expectation is this could change skb->tstamp in the
> ingress skb and redirect to egress sch_fq. It could also set a mono time to
> skb->tstamp where the udp sk->sk_clockid may not be necessary in mono and then
> bpf_redirect to egress sch_fq. When bpf_skb_set_tstamp(skb, tstamp,
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO) succeeds, reading __sk_buff->tstamp_type expects
> BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO also.
>
> I ran out of idea to solve this uapi breakage.
>
> I am afraid it may need to go back to v1 idea and use another bit
> (user_delivery_time) in the skb.
Is the only conflict when bpf_skb_set_tstamp is called for an skb from
a socket with sk_clockid set (and thus SO_TXTIME called)?
Interpreting skb->tstamp as mono if skb->mono_delivery_time is set and
skb->sk is NULL is fine. This is the ingress to egress redirect case.
I don't see an immediate use for this BPF function on egress where it
would overwrite an SO_TXTIME timestamp and now skb->tstamp is mono,
but skb->sk != NULL and skb->sk->sk_clockid != CLOCK_MONOTONIC.
Perhaps bpf_skb_set_tstamp() can just fail if another delivery time is
already explicitly programmed?
skb->sk &&
sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TXTIME) &&
skb->sk->sk_clockid != CLOCK_MONOTONIC
Either that, or unset SOCK_TXTIME to make sk_clockid undefined and
fall back on interpreting as monotonic.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists