netdev - Re: [patch net-next] dpll: spec: use proper enum for pin capabilities attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZfK4jdJCyVzKLTq4@nanopsycho>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:42:53 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com,
	vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] dpll: spec: use proper enum for pin
 capabilities attribute

Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 04:31:11PM CET, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:58:19 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> I think I have his private email, let me follow up off list and either
>> >> put his @intel.com address in the mailmap or the ignore list.  
>> >
>> >Hi Jiri! Do you still want to add him to the ignore list?  
>> 
>> If we are going to start to use .get_maintainer.ignore for this purpose,
>> yes please. Should I send the patch? net-next is closed anyway...
>
>With the current tooling I think it's the best we can do.
>If someone disagrees let them shout at us.
>And we'll shout back that LF should take care of creating
>appropriate tooling.
>But shouting seems unlikely, I sent a patch to add Jeff K 
>and nobody batted an eyelid so far.
>
>Send it for net, it's like a MAINTAINERS update.

Interesting, his email gets no longer returned by get_maintainers.
perhaps there is some timeout there (I was looking but got a bit
Perlsick :)