[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<171046983097.25404.15651868965957197359.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 02:30:30 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Take return from set_memory_ro() into
account with bpf_prog_lock_ro()
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>:
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 06:38:07 +0100 you wrote:
> set_memory_ro() can fail, leaving memory unprotected.
>
> Check its return and take it into account as an error.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/7
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v3,1/2] bpf: Take return from set_memory_ro() into account with bpf_prog_lock_ro()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7d2cc63eca0c
- [bpf-next,v3,2/2] bpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e60adf513275
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists