[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfOalln/myRNOkH6@cy-server>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:47:18 -0500
From: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com,
pctammela@...atatu.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, kuniyu@...zon.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, zzjas98@...il.com
Subject: [net/netlink] Question about potential memleak in
netlink_proto_init()
Dear Netlink Developers,
We are curious whether the function `netlink_proto_init()` might have a memory leak.
The function is https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/net/netlink/af_netlink.c#L2908
and the relevant code is
```
static int __init netlink_proto_init(void)
{
int i;
...
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LINKS; i++) {
if (rhashtable_init(&nl_table[i].hash,
&netlink_rhashtable_params) < 0) {
while (--i > 0)
rhashtable_destroy(&nl_table[i].hash);
kfree(nl_table);
goto panic;
}
}
...
}
```
In the for loop, when `rhashtable_init()` fails, the function will free the allocated memory for `nl_table[i].hash` by checking `while (--i > 0)`. However, the first element (`i=1`) of `nl_table` is not freed since `i` is decremented before the check.
Based on our understanding, a possible fix would be
```
- while (--i > 0)
+ while (--i >= 0)
```
Please kindly correct us if we missed any key information. Looking forward to your response!
Best,
Chenyuan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists