[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65f5b9d952450_6ef3e294f1@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 11:25:13 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/4] gro: fix ownership transfer
Antoine Tenart wrote:
> Issue was found while using rx-gro-list. If fragmented packets are GROed
Only if you need to respin: "If packets are GROed with fraglist"
A bit pedantic, but this is subtle stuff. These are not IP fragmented
packets. Or worse, UDP fragmentation offload.
> in skb_gro_receive_list, they might be segmented later on and continue
> their journey in the stack. In skb_segment_list those skbs can be reused
> as-is. This is an issue as their destructor was removed in
> skb_gro_receive_list but not the reference to their socket, and then
> they can't be orphaned. Fix this by also removing the reference to the
> socket.
>
> For example this could be observed,
>
> kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:3131! (skb_orphan)
> RIP: 0010:ip6_rcv_core+0x11bc/0x19a0
> Call Trace:
> ipv6_list_rcv+0x250/0x3f0
> __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x49d/0x8f0
> netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x634/0xd40
> napi_complete_done+0x1d2/0x7d0
> gro_cell_poll+0x118/0x1f0
>
> A similar construction is found in skb_gro_receive, apply the same
> change there.
>
> Fixes: 5e10da5385d2 ("skbuff: allow 'slow_gro' for skb carring sock reference")
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>
Looks fine to me on the understanding that the only GSO packets that
arrive with skb->sk are are result of the referenced commit, and thus
had sock_wfree as destructor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists