netdev - [v2 net PATCH 5/5] octeontx2-af: Use separate handlers for interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1710754198-18632-6-git-send-email-sbhatta@marvell.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:59:58 +0530
From: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <sgoutham@...vell.com>, <lcherian@...vell.com>,
        <gakula@...vell.com>, <hkelam@...vell.com>, <naveenm@...vell.com>,
        <horms@...nel.org>, Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Subject: [v2 net PATCH 5/5] octeontx2-af: Use separate handlers for interrupts

For PF to AF interrupt vector and VF to AF vector same
interrupt handler is registered which is causing race condition.
When two interrupts are raised to two CPUs at same time
then two cores serve same event corrupting the data.

Fixes: 7304ac4567bc ("octeontx2-af: Add mailbox IRQ and msg handlers")
Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c
index 0b65a18..ff78251 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c
@@ -2533,10 +2533,9 @@ static void rvu_queue_work(struct mbox_wq_info *mw, int first,
 	}
 }
 
-static irqreturn_t rvu_mbox_intr_handler(int irq, void *rvu_irq)
+static irqreturn_t rvu_mbox_pf_intr_handler(int irq, void *rvu_irq)
 {
 	struct rvu *rvu = (struct rvu *)rvu_irq;
-	int vfs = rvu->vfs;
 	u64 intr;
 
 	intr = rvu_read64(rvu, BLKADDR_RVUM, RVU_AF_PFAF_MBOX_INT);
@@ -2550,6 +2549,18 @@ static irqreturn_t rvu_mbox_intr_handler(int irq, void *rvu_irq)
 
 	rvu_queue_work(&rvu->afpf_wq_info, 0, rvu->hw->total_pfs, intr);
 
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t rvu_mbox_intr_handler(int irq, void *rvu_irq)
+{
+	struct rvu *rvu = (struct rvu *)rvu_irq;
+	int vfs = rvu->vfs;
+	u64 intr;
+
+	/* Sync with mbox memory region */
+	rmb();
+
 	/* Handle VF interrupts */
 	if (vfs > 64) {
 		intr = rvupf_read64(rvu, RVU_PF_VFPF_MBOX_INTX(1));
@@ -2894,7 +2905,7 @@ static int rvu_register_interrupts(struct rvu *rvu)
 	/* Register mailbox interrupt handler */
 	sprintf(&rvu->irq_name[RVU_AF_INT_VEC_MBOX * NAME_SIZE], "RVUAF Mbox");
 	ret = request_irq(pci_irq_vector(rvu->pdev, RVU_AF_INT_VEC_MBOX),
-			  rvu_mbox_intr_handler, 0,
+			  rvu_mbox_pf_intr_handler, 0,
 			  &rvu->irq_name[RVU_AF_INT_VEC_MBOX * NAME_SIZE], rvu);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(rvu->dev,
-- 
2.7.4