[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e34a10c2-0901-4fe2-b984-5acca572af6a@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:37:47 +0300
From: Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...e.de>
To: Max Gautier <mg@....gautier.name>, Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2] arpd: create
/var/lib/arpd on first use
On 3/18/24 12:26, Max Gautier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:18:59AM +0000, Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
>>>>>>> + if (strcmp(default_dbname, dbname) == 0
>>>>>>> + && mkdir(ARPDDIR, 0755) != 0
>>>>>>> + && errno != EEXIST
>>>>>> why do you need errno != EEXIST case ? mkdir() will return error
>>>>>> in this case
>>>>> as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> EEXIST is not an error in this case: if the default location already
>>>>> exist, all is good. mkdir would still return -1 in this case, so we
>>>>> need to exclude it manually.
>>>>
>>>> ACK. IMO, it would make a more readable code if you consider splitting the
>>> "if" loop.
>>>
>>> Something like this ? I tend to pack conditions unless branching is necessary,
>>> but no problem if this form is preferred.
>>>
>>> if (strcmp(default_dbname, dbname) == 0) {
>>> if (mkdir(ARPDDIR, 0755) != 0 && errno != EEXIST) {
>>> ...
>>> }
>>> }
>> ACK.
>> instead of errno != EXIST , you may consider stat() before mkdir() call. Just my way thinking(please ignore it, if you don't like).
>> My thinking is --> you need to execute mkdir () only first time, second time onwards, stat() call will return 0.
>
> That's racy: we can stat and have a non existing folder, then have
> another arpd instance (or anything else, really) create the directory,
Agreed ^^
> and we would hit EEXIST anyway when we call mkdir.
> Also, that needs two syscalls instead of one.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists