| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <000000000000dc9aca0613ec855c@google.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 03:07:19 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+c4f4d25859c2e5859988@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, jakub@...udflare.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kafai@...com, kpsingh@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, songliubraving@...com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, yhs@...com
Subject: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: ea80e3ed09ab net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: fix PPE hanging i..
git tree: net
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1249daa5180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=6fb1be60a193d440
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c4f4d25859c2e5859988
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=17fd8c81180000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1795afc1180000
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4c6c49a7ef5c/disk-ea80e3ed.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/242942b30f2d/vmlinux-ea80e3ed.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/74dcc2059655/bzImage-ea80e3ed.xz
The issue was bisected to:
commit ee042be16cb455116d0fe99b77c6bc8baf87c8c6
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Date: Tue Mar 22 18:57:09 2022 +0000
locking: Apply contention tracepoints in the slow path
bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=1702c2a5180000
final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=1482c2a5180000
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1082c2a5180000
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+c4f4d25859c2e5859988@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: ee042be16cb4 ("locking: Apply contention tracepoints in the slow path")
=====================================================
WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
6.8.0-syzkaller-05221-gea80e3ed09ab #0 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
rcu_exp_gp_kthr/18 [HC0[0]:SC0[2]:HE0:SE0] is trying to acquire:
ffff88802b5ab020 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff88802b5ab020 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939
and this task is already holding:
ffffffff8e136558 (rcu_node_0){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: sync_rcu_exp_done_unlocked+0xe/0x140 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:169
which would create a new lock dependency:
(rcu_node_0){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}
but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(rcu_node_0){-.-.}-{2:2}
... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at:
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult+0x27/0x2f0 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:238
csd_do_func kernel/smp.c:133 [inline]
__flush_smp_call_function_queue+0xb2e/0x15b0 kernel/smp.c:542
__sysvec_call_function_single+0xa8/0x3e0 arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:271
instr_sysvec_call_function_single arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:266 [inline]
sysvec_call_function_single+0x9e/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:266
asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:709
__sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x90/0x120
update_event_printk kernel/trace/trace_events.c:2750 [inline]
trace_event_eval_update+0x311/0xf90 kernel/trace/trace_events.c:2922
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xa00/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
(&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}
... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
...
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939
0xffffffffa0001b0e
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
trace_contention_end+0xd7/0x100 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:617 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x2e5/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
futex_cleanup_begin kernel/futex/core.c:1091 [inline]
futex_exit_release+0x34/0x1f0 kernel/futex/core.c:1143
exit_mm_release+0x1a/0x30 kernel/fork.c:1652
exit_mm+0xb0/0x310 kernel/exit.c:542
do_exit+0x99e/0x27e0 kernel/exit.c:865
do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1027
__do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1038 [inline]
__se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1036 [inline]
__x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1036
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock);
local_irq_disable();
lock(rcu_node_0);
lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(rcu_node_0);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by rcu_exp_gp_kthr/18:
#0: ffffffff8e136558 (rcu_node_0){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: sync_rcu_exp_done_unlocked+0xe/0x140 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:169
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:298 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:750 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2380 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0x114/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
the dependencies between HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock:
-> (rcu_node_0){-.-.}-{2:2} {
IN-HARDIRQ-W at:
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult+0x27/0x2f0 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:238
csd_do_func kernel/smp.c:133 [inline]
__flush_smp_call_function_queue+0xb2e/0x15b0 kernel/smp.c:542
__sysvec_call_function_single+0xa8/0x3e0 arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:271
instr_sysvec_call_function_single arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:266 [inline]
sysvec_call_function_single+0x9e/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:266
asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:709
__sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x90/0x120
update_event_printk kernel/trace/trace_events.c:2750 [inline]
trace_event_eval_update+0x311/0xf90 kernel/trace/trace_events.c:2922
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xa00/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
IN-SOFTIRQ-W at:
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
rcu_report_qs_rdp kernel/rcu/tree.c:2018 [inline]
rcu_check_quiescent_state kernel/rcu/tree.c:2100 [inline]
rcu_core+0x3ae/0x1830 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2455
__do_softirq+0x2bc/0x943 kernel/softirq.c:554
invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:428 [inline]
__irq_exit_rcu+0xf2/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:633
irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:645
instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043 [inline]
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa6/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702
unwind_next_frame+0x1d8e/0x2a00 arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c:665
arch_stack_walk+0x151/0x1b0 arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c:25
stack_trace_save+0x118/0x1d0 kernel/stacktrace.c:122
save_stack+0xfb/0x1f0 mm/page_owner.c:129
__set_page_owner+0x29/0x380 mm/page_owner.c:195
set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:31 [inline]
post_alloc_hook+0x1ea/0x210 mm/page_alloc.c:1533
prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1540 [inline]
get_page_from_freelist+0x33ea/0x3580 mm/page_alloc.c:3311
__alloc_pages+0x256/0x680 mm/page_alloc.c:4569
__alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline]
alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline]
alloc_slab_page+0x5f/0x160 mm/slub.c:2190
allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2354 [inline]
new_slab+0x84/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:2407
___slab_alloc+0xd1b/0x13e0 mm/slub.c:3540
__slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3625 [inline]
__slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3678 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3850 [inline]
kmalloc_trace+0x267/0x360 mm/slub.c:4007
kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:590 [inline]
kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:711 [inline]
ddebug_add_module+0x88/0x800 lib/dynamic_debug.c:1240
dynamic_debug_init+0x205/0x5a0 lib/dynamic_debug.c:1446
do_one_initcall+0x238/0x830 init/main.c:1241
do_pre_smp_initcalls+0x57/0xa0 init/main.c:1347
kernel_init_freeable+0x40d/0x5d0 init/main.c:1546
kernel_init+0x1d/0x2a0 init/main.c:1446
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
rcutree_prepare_cpu+0x71/0x640 kernel/rcu/tree.c:4484
rcu_init+0x9b/0x140 kernel/rcu/tree.c:5224
start_kernel+0x1f7/0x500 init/main.c:969
x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x30 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:509
x86_64_start_kernel+0x99/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:490
common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147
}
... key at: [<ffffffff945012e0>] rcu_init_one.rcu_node_class+0x0/0x20
the dependencies between the lock to be acquired
and HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
-> (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2} {
HARDIRQ-ON-W at:
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939
0xffffffffa0001b0e
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
trace_contention_end+0xd7/0x100 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:617 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x2e5/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
futex_cleanup_begin kernel/futex/core.c:1091 [inline]
futex_exit_release+0x34/0x1f0 kernel/futex/core.c:1143
exit_mm_release+0x1a/0x30 kernel/fork.c:1652
exit_mm+0xb0/0x310 kernel/exit.c:542
do_exit+0x99e/0x27e0 kernel/exit.c:865
do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1027
__do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1038 [inline]
__se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1036 [inline]
__x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1036
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939
0xffffffffa0001b0e
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
trace_contention_end+0xd7/0x100 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:617 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x2e5/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
futex_cleanup_begin kernel/futex/core.c:1091 [inline]
futex_exit_release+0x34/0x1f0 kernel/futex/core.c:1143
exit_mm_release+0x1a/0x30 kernel/fork.c:1652
exit_mm+0xb0/0x310 kernel/exit.c:542
do_exit+0x99e/0x27e0 kernel/exit.c:865
do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1027
__do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1038 [inline]
__se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1036 [inline]
__x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1036
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
}
... key at: [<ffffffff94882300>] sock_hash_alloc.__key+0x0/0x20
... acquired at:
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939
bpf_prog_43221478a22f23b5+0x42/0x46
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
trace_contention_end+0xf6/0x120 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
__pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x939/0xc60 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:560
pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:584 [inline]
queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x42/0x50 arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:51
queued_spin_lock include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:114 [inline]
do_raw_spin_lock+0x272/0x370 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:116
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xe1/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
sync_rcu_exp_done_unlocked+0xe/0x140 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:169
synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait_once kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:516 [inline]
synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:570 [inline]
rcu_exp_wait_wake kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:641 [inline]
rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake+0x628/0x1df0 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:675
kthread_worker_fn+0x4bf/0xab0 kernel/kthread.c:841
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 18 Comm: rcu_exp_gp_kthr Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05221-gea80e3ed09ab #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2e0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_bad_irq_dependency kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2626 [inline]
check_irq_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2865 [inline]
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3138 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x4dc7/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939
bpf_prog_43221478a22f23b5+0x42/0x46
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
trace_contention_end+0xf6/0x120 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
__pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x939/0xc60 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:560
pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:584 [inline]
queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x42/0x50 arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:51
queued_spin_lock include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:114 [inline]
do_raw_spin_lock+0x272/0x370 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:116
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xe1/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
sync_rcu_exp_done_unlocked+0xe/0x140 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:169
synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait_once kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:516 [inline]
synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:570 [inline]
rcu_exp_wait_wake kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:641 [inline]
rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake+0x628/0x1df0 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:675
kthread_worker_fn+0x4bf/0xab0 kernel/kthread.c:841
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
</TASK>
------------[ cut here ]------------
raw_local_irq_restore() called with IRQs enabled
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 18 at kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10 warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x29/0x40 kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 18 Comm: rcu_exp_gp_kthr Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05221-gea80e3ed09ab #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024
RIP: 0010:warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x29/0x40 kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10
Code: 90 f3 0f 1e fa 90 80 3d 9e 69 01 04 00 74 06 90 c3 cc cc cc cc c6 05 8f 69 01 04 01 90 48 c7 c7 20 ba aa 8b e8 f8 e5 e7 f5 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 90 c3 cc cc cc cc 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f
RSP: 0018:ffffc90000177bb8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: bd04dc17ab040900 RBX: 1ffff9200002ef7c RCX: ffff8880172c1e00
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffffc90000177c48 R08: ffffffff8157cc12 R09: 1ffff9200002eecc
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff5200002eecd R12: dffffc0000000000
R13: 1ffff9200002ef78 R14: ffffc90000177be0 R15: 0000000000000246
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f6d95bcb0d0 CR3: 000000002098e000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:151 [inline]
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x120/0x140 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194
sync_rcu_exp_done_unlocked+0xdb/0x140 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:171
synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait_once kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:516 [inline]
synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:570 [inline]
rcu_exp_wait_wake kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:641 [inline]
rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake+0x628/0x1df0 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h:675
kthread_worker_fn+0x4bf/0xab0 kernel/kthread.c:841
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists