[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4808eab5fc5c85f12fe7d923de697a78@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:59:30 +0100
From: Tobias Huschle <huschle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Luis Machado <luis.machado@....com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nd <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: EEVDF/vhost regression (bisected to 86bfbb7ce4f6 sched/fair: Add
lag based placement)
On 2024-03-19 09:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 09:21:06AM +0100, Tobias Huschle wrote:
>> On 2024-03-15 11:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 09:33:49AM +0100, Tobias Huschle wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:09:25AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > > >
>> >
>> > Could you remind me pls, what is the kworker doing specifically that
>> > vhost is relying on?
>>
>> The kworker is handling the actual data moving in memory if I'm not
>> mistaking.
>
> I think that is the vhost process itself. Maybe you mean the
> guest thread versus the vhost thread then?
My understanding was that vhost writes data into a file descriptor which
then triggers eventfd.
That's at least how I read the vhost code if I remember correctly.
The handler beneath (the kworker) then runs the actual instructions that
move the data to the receiving vhost on the other end of the connection.
Again, I might be wrong here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists