netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] nfc: st95hf: Switch to using gpiod API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:12:58 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] nfc: st95hf: Switch to using gpiod API

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:27:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:25:34AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:39:23PM CET, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > >This updates the driver to gpiod API, and removes yet another use of
> > >of_get_named_gpio().
> > >
> > net-next is closed, send again next week.
> 
> Same Q: Why to resend? Can't you utilise lore.kernel.org?

Because that is how Netdev development currently operates.
A system which I believe emerged as a way to handle the
enormous volume of patches involved. Maybe it could change,
but that is a different conversation.

Other subsystems work differently, and that is fine too.

https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#git-trees-and-patch-flow