netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] selftests/xsk: add new test case for AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240321134911.120091-8-tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:49:11 +0000
From: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@...el.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bjorn@...nel.org,
	magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
	maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
	jonathan.lemon@...il.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	ast@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com,
	tushar.vyavahare@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] selftests/xsk: add new test case for AF_XDP under max ring sizes

Introduce a test case to evaluate AF_XDP's robustness by pushing hardware
and software ring sizes to their limits. This test ensures AF_XDP's
reliability amidst potential producer/consumer throttling due to maximum
ring utilization. The testing strategy includes:

1. Configuring rings to their maximum allowable sizes.
2. Executing a series of tests across diverse batch sizes to assess
   system's behavior under different configurations.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@...el.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
index dac2dcf39bb8..2eac0895b0a1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
@@ -2439,6 +2439,30 @@ static int testapp_hw_sw_min_ring_size(struct test_spec *test)
 	return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
 }
 
+static int testapp_hw_sw_max_ring_size(struct test_spec *test)
+{
+	u32 max_descs = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS * 2;
+	int ret;
+
+	test->set_ring = true;
+	test->total_steps = 2;
+	test->ifobj_tx->ring.tx_pending = test->ifobj_tx->ring.tx_max_pending;
+	test->ifobj_tx->ring.rx_pending  = test->ifobj_tx->ring.rx_max_pending;
+	test->ifobj_rx->umem->num_frames = max_descs;
+	test->ifobj_rx->xsk->rxqsize = max_descs;
+	test->ifobj_tx->xsk->batch_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS;
+	test->ifobj_rx->xsk->batch_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS;
+
+	ret = testapp_validate_traffic(test);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Set batch_size to 4095 */
+	test->ifobj_tx->xsk->batch_size = max_descs - 1;
+	test->ifobj_rx->xsk->batch_size = max_descs - 1;
+	return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
+}
+
 static void run_pkt_test(struct test_spec *test)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -2544,6 +2568,7 @@ static const struct test_spec tests[] = {
 	{.name = "UNALIGNED_INV_DESC_MULTI_BUFF", .test_func = testapp_unaligned_inv_desc_mb},
 	{.name = "TOO_MANY_FRAGS", .test_func = testapp_too_many_frags},
 	{.name = "HW_SW_MIN_RING_SIZE", .test_func = testapp_hw_sw_min_ring_size},
+	{.name = "HW_SW_MAX_RING_SIZE", .test_func = testapp_hw_sw_max_ring_size},
 	};
 
 static void print_tests(void)
-- 
2.34.1