netdev - Re: [PATCH vhost v4 03/10] virtio_ring: packed: structure the indirect desc table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACGkMEs_DT1309_hj8igcvX7H1sU+-s_OP6Jnp-c=0kmu+ia_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 12:47:18 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost v4 03/10] virtio_ring: packed: structure the
 indirect desc table

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:36 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> This commit structure the indirect desc table.
> Then we can get the desc num directly when doing unmap.
>
> And save the dma info to the struct, then the indirect
> will not use the dma fields of the desc_extra. The subsequent
> commits will make the dma fields are optional. But for
> the indirect case, we must record the dma info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 0dfbd17e5a87..22a588bba166 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -72,9 +72,16 @@ struct vring_desc_state_split {
>         struct vring_desc *indir_desc;  /* Indirect descriptor, if any. */
>  };
>
> +struct vring_packed_desc_indir {
> +       dma_addr_t addr;                /* Descriptor Array DMA addr. */
> +       u32 len;                        /* Descriptor Array length. */
> +       u32 num;
> +       struct vring_packed_desc desc[];
> +};
> +
>  struct vring_desc_state_packed {
>         void *data;                     /* Data for callback. */
> -       struct vring_packed_desc *indir_desc; /* Indirect descriptor, if any. */
> +       struct vring_packed_desc_indir *indir_desc; /* Indirect descriptor, if any. */

Maybe it's better just to have a vring_desc_extra here.

Thanks