[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5c61607-4d66-4cd8-bf45-0aac2b3af126@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:18:09 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
Leonid Bloch <lbloch@...dia.com>, Itay Avraham <itayavr@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Aron Silverton <aron.silverton@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] mlx5 ConnectX control misc driver
On 3/22/24 2:58 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> The more I learn, the more I am convinced that the technical
> justifications here are just smoke and mirrors. The main motivation for
> nVidia, Broadcom, (and Enfabrica?) being to hide as much as possible of
> what you consider your proprietary advantage in the "AI gold rush". RDMA
> is what it is but I really hate how you're trying to pretend that it's
> is somehow an inherent need of advanced technology and we need to lower
> the openness standards for all of the kernel.
Kuba:
can you respond to Jason's email with the proposal for the new fwctl
subsystem and identify places you do not agree? That would provide more
concrete discussion points. Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists