[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240322155550.3779c85a@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:55:50 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 0/4] gro: various fixes related to UDP tunnels
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:46:19 +0100 Antoine Tenart wrote:
> We found issues when a UDP tunnel endpoint is in a different netns than
> where UDP GRO happens. This kind of setup is actually quite diverse,
> from having one leg of the tunnel on a remove host, to having a tunnel
> between netns (eg. being bridged in another one or on the host). In our
> case that UDP tunnel was geneve.
I think this series makes net/udpgro_fwd.sh selftest fail.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists