netdev - [PATCH net-next] net/smc: make smc_hash_sk/smc_unhash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240325012501.709009-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:25:01 +0800
From: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>, <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>, <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>, <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<weiyongjun1@...wei.com>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: make smc_hash_sk/smc_unhash_sk static

smc_hash_sk and smc_unhash_sk are only used in af_smc.c, so make them
static and remove the output symbol. They can be called under the path
.prot->hash()/unhash().

Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
---
 include/net/smc.h | 3 ---
 net/smc/af_smc.c  | 6 ++----
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/smc.h b/include/net/smc.h
index c9dcb30e3fd9..10684d0a33df 100644
--- a/include/net/smc.h
+++ b/include/net/smc.h
@@ -26,9 +26,6 @@ struct smc_hashinfo {
 	struct hlist_head ht;
 };
 
-int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk);
-void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk);
-
 /* SMCD/ISM device driver interface */
 struct smcd_dmb {
 	u64 dmb_tok;
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 4b52b3b159c0..e8dcd28a554c 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static struct smc_hashinfo smc_v6_hashinfo = {
 	.lock = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(smc_v6_hashinfo.lock),
 };
 
-int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk)
+static int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct smc_hashinfo *h = sk->sk_prot->h.smc_hash;
 	struct hlist_head *head;
@@ -191,9 +191,8 @@ int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smc_hash_sk);
 
-void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk)
+static void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct smc_hashinfo *h = sk->sk_prot->h.smc_hash;
 
@@ -202,7 +201,6 @@ void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk)
 		sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1);
 	write_unlock_bh(&h->lock);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smc_unhash_sk);
 
 /* This will be called before user really release sock_lock. So do the
  * work which we didn't do because of user hold the sock_lock in the
-- 
2.34.1