[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5487514f828e0347d2b92ca40002c62b58af73d.1711120964.git.sd@queasysnail.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:56:45 +0100
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/4] tls: recv: process_rx_list shouldn't use an offset with kvec
Only MSG_PEEK needs to copy from an offset during the final
process_rx_list call, because the bytes we copied at the beginning of
tls_sw_recvmsg were left on the rx_list. In the KVEC case, we removed
data from the rx_list as we were copying it, so there's no need to use
an offset, just like in the normal case.
Fixes: 692d7b5d1f91 ("tls: Fix recvmsg() to be able to peek across multiple records")
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
---
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 211f57164cb6..3cdc6bc9fba6 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -2152,7 +2152,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
}
/* Drain records from the rx_list & copy if required */
- if (is_peek || is_kvec)
+ if (is_peek)
err = process_rx_list(ctx, msg, &control, copied + peeked,
decrypted - peeked, is_peek, NULL);
else
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists