lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240325175117.45750-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:51:17 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <wujianguo106@....com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Fix inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any() regression

From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo106@....com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:16:09 +0800
> Hi Kuniyuki,
> Thanks for your reply!
> 
> On 2024/3/21 12:55, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Thanks for the patch.
> > 
> > From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo106@....com>
> > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:02:36 +0800
> >> From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...natelecom.cn>
> >>
> >> If we bind() a TCPv4 socket to 0.0.0.0:8090, then bind() a TCPv6(ipv6only) socket
> > 
> > Please wrap each line at <75 characters except for logs/output like below.
> > 
> OK.
> > 
> >> to :::8090, both without SO_REUSEPORT, then bind() 127.0.0.1:8090, it should fail
> > 
> > [::]:8090 is easier to read and the recommended way.
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5952#section-6
> > 
> > But please keep the netstat output as is.
> > 
> >> but now succeeds. like this:
> >>   tcp        0      0 127.0.0.1:8090          0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN
> >>   tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:8090            0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN
> >>   tcp6       0      0 :::8090                 :::*                    LISTEN
> >>
> >> bind() 0.0.0.0:8090, :::8090 and ::1:8090 are all fail.
> > 
> > What do you mean by all fail ?
> > At least, [::1]:8090 would fail with the current code in this case.
> In my test, 127.0.0.1:8090  succeeds, 0.0.0.0:8090, [::]:8090 and [::1]:8090 are all fail
> 
> > 
> > 
> >> But if we bind() a TCPv6(ipv6only) socket to :::8090 first, then  bind() a TCPv4
> >> socket to 0.0.0.0:8090, then bind() 127.0.0.1:8090, 0.0.0.0:8090, :::8090 and ::1:8090 are all fail.
> >>
> >> When bind() 127.0.0.1:8090, inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any() will return true as tb->addr_type == IPV6_ADDR_ANY,
> > 
> > Let's use tb2 here for inet_bind2_bucket.. yes it's not consistent
> > in some functions like inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any() though.
> yes, inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any() use tb, so I use tb here.
> 
> > 
> > 
> >> and tb is refer to the TCPv6 socket(:::8090), then inet_bhash2_conflict() return false, That is, there is no conflict,
> > 
> > Also make it clear that the TCPv6 socket is ipv6only one.
> > 
> > 
> >> so bind() succeeds.
> >>
> >>   inet_bhash2_addr_any_conflict()
> >>   {
> >> 	inet_bind_bucket_for_each(tb2, &head2->chain)
> >> 		// tb2 is IPv6
> >> 		if (inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(tb2, net, port, l3mdev, sk))
> >> 			break;
> >>
> >> 	// inet_bhash2_conflict() return false
> >> 	if (tb2 && inet_bhash2_conflict(sk, tb2, uid, relax, reuseport_cb_ok,
> >>                                 reuseport_ok)) {
> >> 		spin_unlock(&head2->lock);
> >> 		return true;
> >> 	}
> >>
> >>   }
> >>
> >> Fixes: 5a22bba13d01 ("tcp: Save address type in inet_bind2_bucket.")
> > 
> > This is not the commit that introduced the regression.
> I will remove this.
> > 
> > Also, you need Signed-off-by tag here.
> OK.
> > 
> > 
> >> ---
> >>  net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 4 ++--
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> >> index 7498af320164..3eeaca8a113f 100644
> >> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> >> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> >> @@ -830,8 +830,8 @@ bool inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(const struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb, const
> >>  		return false;
> >>
> >>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> >> -	if (tb->addr_type == IPV6_ADDR_ANY)
> >> -		return true;
> >> +	if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
> >> +		return tb->addr_type == IPV6_ADDR_ANY;
> > 
> > This fix is not correct and will break v4-mapped-v6 address cases.
> > You can run bind_wildcard under the selftest directory.
> >> Probably we need v6_only bit in tb2 and should add some test cases
> > in the selftest.
> How about this?
> I add a new field ipv6_only to struct inet_bind2_bucket{}
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/inet_hashtables.h b/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
> index 7f1b38458743..fb7c250a663b 100644
> --- a/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
> +++ b/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ struct inet_bind2_bucket {
>  	int			l3mdev;
>  	unsigned short		port;
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> +	bool			ipv6_only;
>  	unsigned short		addr_type;
>  	struct in6_addr		v6_rcv_saddr;
>  #define rcv_saddr		v6_rcv_saddr.s6_addr32[3]
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> index cf88eca5f1b4..5fc749f8f2b1 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ static void inet_bind2_bucket_init(struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb2,
>  	tb2->port = tb->port;
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(USHRT_MAX < (IPV6_ADDR_ANY | IPV6_ADDR_MAPPED));
> +	tb2->ipv6_only = ipv6_only_sock(sk);
>  	if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6) {
>  		tb2->addr_type = ipv6_addr_type(&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr);
>  		tb2->v6_rcv_saddr = sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr;
> @@ -831,7 +832,8 @@ bool inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(const struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb, const
> 
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>  	if (tb->addr_type == IPV6_ADDR_ANY)
> -		return true;
> +		if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 || !tb->ipv6_only)
> +			return true;
> 
>  	if (tb->addr_type != IPV6_ADDR_MAPPED)
>  		return false;
> 

I found a corner case that does not work with this change.
The 3rd bind() should fail but succeeds with the v6only flag approach.

---8<---
from socket import *

s1 = socket(AF_INET6)
s1.setsockopt(41, IPV6_V6ONLY, 1)
s1.setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
s1.bind(('::', 8000))

s2 = socket(AF_INET6)
s2.setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
s2.bind(('::', 8000))

s3 = socket(AF_INET)
s3.bind(('127.0.0.1', 8000))
---8<---


To cover this case, the only solution is to iterate over the buckets
in the same hash.  Also, this change can be backported to 6.1.

---8<---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index 612aa1d2eff7..63e8f2df0681 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ static bool inet_bhash2_addr_any_conflict(const struct sock *sk, int port, int l
 	struct sock_reuseport *reuseport_cb;
 	struct inet_bind_hashbucket *head2;
 	struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb2;
+	bool conflict = false;
 	bool reuseport_cb_ok;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
@@ -300,18 +301,20 @@ static bool inet_bhash2_addr_any_conflict(const struct sock *sk, int port, int l
 
 	spin_lock(&head2->lock);
 
-	inet_bind_bucket_for_each(tb2, &head2->chain)
-		if (inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(tb2, net, port, l3mdev, sk))
-			break;
+	inet_bind_bucket_for_each(tb2, &head2->chain) {
+		if (!inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(tb2, net, port, l3mdev, sk))
+			continue;
 
-	if (tb2 && inet_bhash2_conflict(sk, tb2, uid, relax, reuseport_cb_ok,
-					reuseport_ok)) {
-		spin_unlock(&head2->lock);
-		return true;
+		if (!inet_bhash2_conflict(sk, tb2, uid, relax, reuseport_cb_ok,	reuseport_ok))
+			continue;
+
+		conflict = true;
+		break;
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&head2->lock);
-	return false;
+
+	return conflict;
 }
 
 /*
---8<---


Also, I found another regression that my recent patch introduced.
The second bind() should succeed but now fails.

---8<---
from socket import *

s1 = socket(AF_INET6)
s1.setsockopt(41, IPV6_V6ONLY, 1)
s1.bind(('::', 8000))

s2 = socket(AF_INET6)
s2.bind(('::ffff:127.0.0.1', 8000))
---8<---

and we need this change.

---8<---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index 7d8090f109ef..612aa1d2eff7 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ static bool __inet_bhash2_conflict(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *sk2,
 				   kuid_t sk_uid, bool relax,
 				   bool reuseport_cb_ok, bool reuseport_ok)
 {
-	if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET && ipv6_only_sock(sk2))
+	if (ipv6_only_sock(sk2) &&
+	    (sk->sk_family == AF_INET || ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr)))
 		return false;
 
 	return inet_bind_conflict(sk, sk2, sk_uid, relax,
---8<---


I'll post a series including necessary tests.

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ