netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 12/12] dt-bindings: net: add Microchip's LAN865X 10BASE-T1S MACPHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8fc993af-7803-46e7-aed6-318ff398bbd4@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:12:49 +0000
From: <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>
To: <conor@...nel.org>
CC: <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<horms@...nel.org>, <saeedm@...dia.com>, <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <corbet@....net>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>,
	<ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
	<vladimir.oltean@....com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
	<Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com>, <Pier.Beruto@...emi.com>,
	<Selvamani.Rajagopal@...emi.com>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
	<benjamin.bigler@...nformulastudent.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 12/12] dt-bindings: net: add Microchip's
 LAN865X 10BASE-T1S MACPHY

Hi Conor,

On 22/03/24 11:38 pm, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 06:25:02AM +0000,Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com  wrote:
>> Ah ok, now I understand this. Then it is supposed to be like below,
>>
>> properties:
>>
>>     compatible:
>>
>>       oneOf:
>>
>>         - const: microchip,lan8650
>>
>>         - items:
>>
>>             - const: microchip,lan8651
>>
>>             - const: microchip,lan8650
>>
>> Executed dt_binding_check with the above update and it was successful.
>> Hope this is OK?
> That looks about what I would expect to see, yes.
OK, thanks for the confirmation. I will update this change in the next 
version.

Best regards,
Parthiban V
>