netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix usable ports on 88e6020

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240326143424.3368d9b1@wsk>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:34:24 +0100
From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
 Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
 <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...tq-group.com, Michael Krummsdorf
 <michael.krummsdorf@...group.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix usable ports on 88e6020

Hi Matthias,

> From: Michael Krummsdorf <michael.krummsdorf@...group.com>
> 
> The switch has 4 ports with 2 internal PHYs, but ports are numbered up
> to 6, with ports 0, 1, 5 and 6 being usable.
> 
> Fixes: 71d94a432a15 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for MV88E6020
> switch") Signed-off-by: Michael Krummsdorf
> <michael.krummsdorf@...group.com> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer
> <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> ---
> 
> I was unfortunately too busy to notice the issue when the patch this
> Fixes was resubmitted in my name. It would have been better to change
> my From into a Based-on-patch-by or similar when modifying it

The "discussion" about this work was lasting at least a few months with
several iterations and changing the design decisions ...

> - and
> the final version obviously wasn't even tested on an 88E6020...

Can you share on which kernel version have you tested the patch that
you claim that testing was omitted?

> 
> Best regards,
> Matthias
> 
> 
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c index 9ed1821184ece..c95787cb90867
> 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> @@ -5503,8 +5503,12 @@ static const struct mv88e6xxx_info
> mv88e6xxx_table[] = { .family = MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6250,
>  		.name = "Marvell 88E6020",
>  		.num_databases = 64,
> -		.num_ports = 4,
> +		/* Ports 2-4 are not routed to pins
> +		 * => usable ports 0, 1, 5, 6
> +		 */
> +		.num_ports = 7,
>  		.num_internal_phys = 2,
> +		.invalid_port_mask = BIT(2) | BIT(3) | BIT(4),
>  		.max_vid = 4095,
>  		.port_base_addr = 0x8,
>  		.phy_base_addr = 0x0,

Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@...x.de

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped