[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e2df22d-ffaf-4457-8d6f-079c1dcf9bec@openvpn.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:39:50 +0100
From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>
To: Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 03/22] ovpn: add basic netlink support
On 26/03/2024 12:43, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c b/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c
>> index 25964eb89aac..3769f99cfe6f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c
>> @@ -101,12 +104,23 @@ static int __init ovpn_init(void)
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> + err = ovpn_nl_register();
>> + if (err) {
>> + pr_err("ovpn: can't register netlink family: %d\n", err);
>> + goto unreg_netdev;
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +unreg_netdev:
>> + unregister_netdevice_notifier(&ovpn_netdev_notifier);
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> static __exit void ovpn_cleanup(void)
>> {
>> unregister_netdevice_notifier(&ovpn_netdev_notifier);
>> + ovpn_nl_unregister();
>
> Any good reason for not using reverse order from ovpn_init() here?
not really.
Actually I also prefer uninit in reverse order compared to init.
Will fix this, thanks!
>
>> }
>
> /Esben
--
Antonio Quartulli
OpenVPN Inc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists