netdev - [PATCH net 1/1] s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240328154144.272275-2-gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:41:44 +0100
From: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>, Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        schnelle@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/1] s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation

Since [1], dma_alloc_coherent() does not accept requests for GFP_COMP
anymore, even on archs that may be able to fulfill this. Functionality that
relied on the receive buffer being a compound page broke at that point:
The SMC-D protocol, that utilizes the ism device driver, passes receive
buffers to the splice processor in a struct splice_pipe_desc with a
single entry list of struct pages. As the buffer is no longer a compound
page, the splice processor now rejects requests to handle more than a
page worth of data.

Replace dma_alloc_coherent() and allocate a buffer with kmalloc() then
create a DMA map for it with dma_map_page(). Since only receive buffers
on ISM devices use DMA, qualify the mapping as FROM_DEVICE.
Since ISM devices are available on arch s390, only and on that arch all
DMA is coherent, there is no need to introduce and export some kind of
dma_sync_to_cpu() method to be called by the SMC-D protocol layer.

Analogously, replace dma_free_coherent by a two step dma_unmap_page,
then kfree to free the receive buffer.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221113163535.884299-1-hch@lst.de/

Fixes: c08004eede4b ("s390/ism: don't pass bogus GFP_ flags to dma_alloc_coherent")
Signed-off-by: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c b/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c
index 2c8e964425dc..25911b887e5e 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/ctype.h>
 #include <linux/processor.h>
+#include <linux/dma-direction.h>
+#include <linux/gfp_types.h>
 
 #include "ism.h"
 
@@ -292,13 +294,15 @@ static int ism_read_local_gid(struct ism_dev *ism)
 static void ism_free_dmb(struct ism_dev *ism, struct ism_dmb *dmb)
 {
 	clear_bit(dmb->sba_idx, ism->sba_bitmap);
-	dma_free_coherent(&ism->pdev->dev, dmb->dmb_len,
-			  dmb->cpu_addr, dmb->dma_addr);
+	dma_unmap_page(&ism->pdev->dev, dmb->dma_addr, dmb->dmb_len,
+		       DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+	kfree(dmb->cpu_addr);
 }
 
 static int ism_alloc_dmb(struct ism_dev *ism, struct ism_dmb *dmb)
 {
 	unsigned long bit;
+	int rc;
 
 	if (PAGE_ALIGN(dmb->dmb_len) > dma_get_max_seg_size(&ism->pdev->dev))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -315,14 +319,27 @@ static int ism_alloc_dmb(struct ism_dev *ism, struct ism_dmb *dmb)
 	    test_and_set_bit(dmb->sba_idx, ism->sba_bitmap))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	dmb->cpu_addr = dma_alloc_coherent(&ism->pdev->dev, dmb->dmb_len,
-					   &dmb->dma_addr,
-					   GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN |
-					   __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NORETRY);
-	if (!dmb->cpu_addr)
-		clear_bit(dmb->sba_idx, ism->sba_bitmap);
+	dmb->cpu_addr = kmalloc(dmb->dmb_len, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN |
+				__GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NORETRY);
+	if (!dmb->cpu_addr) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out_bit;
+	}
+	dmb->dma_addr = dma_map_page(&ism->pdev->dev,
+				     virt_to_page(dmb->cpu_addr), 0,
+				     dmb->dmb_len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+	if (dma_mapping_error(&ism->pdev->dev, dmb->dma_addr)) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out_free;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 
-	return dmb->cpu_addr ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+out_free:
+	kfree(dmb->cpu_addr);
+out_bit:
+	clear_bit(dmb->sba_idx, ism->sba_bitmap);
+	return rc;
 }
 
 int ism_register_dmb(struct ism_dev *ism, struct ism_dmb *dmb,
-- 
2.44.0