[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240328044715.266641-4-danielj@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 06:47:12 +0200
From: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <mst@...hat.com>, <jasowang@...hat.com>, <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<virtualization@...ts.linux.dev>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<jiri@...dia.com>, Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] virtio_net: Add a lock for the command VQ.
The command VQ will no longer be protected by the RTNL lock. Use a
spinlock to protect the control buffer header and the VQ.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index ff93d18992e4..b9298544b1b5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ struct virtnet_info {
/* Has control virtqueue */
bool has_cvq;
+ spinlock_t cvq_lock;
/* Host can handle any s/g split between our header and packet data */
bool any_header_sg;
@@ -2529,6 +2530,7 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,
/* Caller should know better */
BUG_ON(!virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ));
+ guard(spinlock)(&vi->cvq_lock);
vi->ctrl->status = ~0;
vi->ctrl->hdr.class = class;
vi->ctrl->hdr.cmd = cmd;
@@ -4800,8 +4802,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
vi->any_header_sg = true;
- if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ))
+ if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ)) {
vi->has_cvq = true;
+ spin_lock_init(&vi->cvq_lock);
+ }
if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU)) {
mtu = virtio_cread16(vdev,
--
2.42.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists