netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] mlx5e misc patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a7f042f9-7e74-457b-876a-6a7427a55847@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:28:29 +0200
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
 Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] mlx5e misc patches

On 28/03/2024 18:25, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:20:14 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> This patchset includes small features and misc code enhancements for the
>> mlx5e driver.
>>
>> Patches 1-4 by Gal improves the mlx5e ethtool stats implementation, for
>> example by using standard helpers ethtool_sprintf/puts.
>>
>> Patch 5 by Carolina adds exposure of RX packet drop counters of VFs/SFs
>> on their representor.
>>
>> Patch 6 by me adds a reset option for the FW command interface debugfs
>> stats entries. This allows explicit FW command interface stats reset
>> between different runs of a test case.
>>
>> Patches 7 and 8 are simple cleanups.
> 
> This is purely mlx5 changes, since you're not listed as the maintainer
> it'd be good to add an note to the cover letter explaining your
> expectations. 

This is targeted for net-next. I should add myself in the proper mlx5 
maintainers section. We'll submit a patch for that.

> Otherwise you may have just typo'ed the subject and
> have actually meant it for mlx5-next.
>