lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66060418e8488_2c310729489@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:58:16 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
 "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 eric.dumazet@...il.com, 
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] udp: avoid calling sock_def_readable() if
 possible

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> sock_def_readable() is quite expensive (particularly
> when ep_poll_callback() is in the picture).
> 
> We must call sk->sk_data_ready() when :
> 
> - receive queue was empty, or
> - SO_PEEK_OFF is enabled on the socket, or
> - sk->sk_data_ready is not sock_def_readable.
> 
> We still need to call sk_wake_async().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ