| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACGkMEsrB_vjUqMXvAZyLxGz4QtMky5wn8ozf-+w9eXn7agTSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:07:03 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost v6 03/10] virtio_ring: packed: structure the
indirect desc table
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 3:38 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:56:55 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 7:14 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This commit structure the indirect desc table.
> > > Then we can get the desc num directly when doing unmap.
> > >
> > > And save the dma info to the struct, then the indirect
> > > will not use the dma fields of the desc_extra. The subsequent
> > > commits will make the dma fields are optional.
> >
> > Nit: It's better to add something like "so we can't reuse the
> > desc_extra[] array"
> >
> > > But for
> > > the indirect case, we must record the dma info.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > index a2838fe1cc08..e3343cf55774 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ struct vring_desc_state_split {
> > >
> > > struct vring_desc_state_packed {
> > > void *data; /* Data for callback. */
> > > - struct vring_packed_desc *indir_desc; /* Indirect descriptor, if any. */
> > > + struct vring_desc_extra *indir_desc; /* Indirect descriptor, if any. */
> >
> > Should be "DMA info with indirect descriptor, if any" ?
> >
> > > u16 num; /* Descriptor list length. */
> > > u16 last; /* The last desc state in a list. */
> > > };
> > > @@ -1243,10 +1243,13 @@ static void vring_unmap_desc_packed(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > > DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static struct vring_packed_desc *alloc_indirect_packed(unsigned int total_sg,
> > > - gfp_t gfp)
> > > +static struct vring_desc_extra *alloc_indirect_packed(unsigned int total_sg,
> > > + gfp_t gfp)
> > > {
> > > - struct vring_packed_desc *desc;
> > > + struct vring_desc_extra *in_extra;
> > > + u32 size;
> > > +
> > > + size = sizeof(*in_extra) + sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc) * total_sg;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * We require lowmem mappings for the descriptors because
> > > @@ -1255,9 +1258,10 @@ static struct vring_packed_desc *alloc_indirect_packed(unsigned int total_sg,
> > > */
> > > gfp &= ~__GFP_HIGHMEM;
> > >
> > > - desc = kmalloc_array(total_sg, sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc), gfp);
> > >
> > > - return desc;
> > > + in_extra = kmalloc(size, gfp);
> > > +
> > > + return in_extra;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > > @@ -1268,6 +1272,7 @@ static int virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > > void *data,
> > > gfp_t gfp)
> > > {
> > > + struct vring_desc_extra *in_extra;
> > > struct vring_packed_desc *desc;
> > > struct scatterlist *sg;
> > > unsigned int i, n, err_idx;
> > > @@ -1275,10 +1280,12 @@ static int virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > > dma_addr_t addr;
> > >
> > > head = vq->packed.next_avail_idx;
> > > - desc = alloc_indirect_packed(total_sg, gfp);
> > > - if (!desc)
> > > + in_extra = alloc_indirect_packed(total_sg, gfp);
> > > + if (!in_extra)
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > + desc = (struct vring_packed_desc *)(in_extra + 1);
> > > +
> > > if (unlikely(vq->vq.num_free < 1)) {
> > > pr_debug("Can't add buf len 1 - avail = 0\n");
> > > kfree(desc);
> > > @@ -1315,17 +1322,16 @@ static int virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > > goto unmap_release;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (vq->use_dma_api) {
> > > + in_extra->addr = addr;
> > > + in_extra->len = total_sg * sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc);
> > > + }
> >
> > Any reason why we don't do it after the below assignment of descriptor fields?
> >
> > > +
> > > vq->packed.vring.desc[head].addr = cpu_to_le64(addr);
> > > vq->packed.vring.desc[head].len = cpu_to_le32(total_sg *
> > > sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc));
> > > vq->packed.vring.desc[head].id = cpu_to_le16(id);
> > >
> > > - if (vq->use_dma_api) {
> > > - vq->packed.desc_extra[id].addr = addr;
> > > - vq->packed.desc_extra[id].len = total_sg *
> > > - sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > vq->packed.desc_extra[id].flags = VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT |
> > > vq->packed.avail_used_flags;
> > >
> > > @@ -1356,7 +1362,7 @@ static int virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > > /* Store token and indirect buffer state. */
> > > vq->packed.desc_state[id].num = 1;
> > > vq->packed.desc_state[id].data = data;
> > > - vq->packed.desc_state[id].indir_desc = desc;
> > > + vq->packed.desc_state[id].indir_desc = in_extra;
> > > vq->packed.desc_state[id].last = id;
> > >
> > > vq->num_added += 1;
> > > @@ -1375,7 +1381,7 @@ static int virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > > vring_unmap_desc_packed(vq, &desc[i]);
> > >
> > > free_desc:
> > > - kfree(desc);
> > > + kfree(in_extra);
> > >
> > > END_USE(vq);
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > @@ -1589,7 +1595,6 @@ static void detach_buf_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > > unsigned int id, void **ctx)
> > > {
> > > struct vring_desc_state_packed *state = NULL;
> > > - struct vring_packed_desc *desc;
> > > unsigned int i, curr;
> > > u16 flags;
> > >
> > > @@ -1616,27 +1621,27 @@ static void detach_buf_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > > if (ctx)
> > > *ctx = state->indir_desc;
> > > } else {
> > > - const struct vring_desc_extra *extra;
> > > - u32 len;
> > > + struct vring_desc_extra *in_extra;
> > > + struct vring_packed_desc *desc;
> > > + u32 num;
> > > +
> > > + in_extra = state->indir_desc;
> > >
> > > if (vq->use_dma_api) {
> > > - extra = &vq->packed.desc_extra[id];
> > > dma_unmap_single(vring_dma_dev(vq),
> > > - extra->addr, extra->len,
> > > + in_extra->addr, in_extra->len,
> > > (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ?
> > > DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >
> > Can't we just reuse vring_unmap_extra_packed() here?
>
> vring_unmap_extra_packed calls dma_unmap_page.
> Here needs dma_unmap_single.
>
> You mean we call dma_unmap_page directly.
Nope, I meant having a helper for this.
Thanks
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > > }
> > >
> > > - /* Free the indirect table, if any, now that it's unmapped. */
> > > - desc = state->indir_desc;
> > > -
> > > if (vring_need_unmap_buffer(vq)) {
> > > - len = vq->packed.desc_extra[id].len;
> > > - for (i = 0; i < len / sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc);
> > > - i++)
> > > + num = in_extra->len / sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc);
> > > + desc = (struct vring_packed_desc *)(in_extra + 1);
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
> > > vring_unmap_desc_packed(vq, &desc[i]);
> > > }
> > > - kfree(desc);
> > > + kfree(in_extra);
> > > state->indir_desc = NULL;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
> > >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists