netdev - RE: Should be PATCH v3 instead of PATCH v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240328081226.31280-1-atlas.yu@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:12:27 +0800
From: Atlas Yu <atlas.yu@...onical.com>
To: hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc: atlas.yu@...onical.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	nic_swsd@...ltek.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: RE: Should be PATCH v3 instead of PATCH v2

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 2:49 PM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:

> You sent a v2 already, so I think this is v3. And the change log is missing.
> But as the change is more or less trivial, no need to resubmit IMO.

I'm sorry for the confusion. I throught that v2 does not count, since I sent
that within 24 hours and instead of creating a new thread, I just replied to
the original thread.

I will make sure to include the change log in the next patch submission. Let
me check other contributors' patches to see how they format their change log.