[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEvdw4Yf2B1QGed0W7wLhOHU9+Vo_Z3h=4Yr9ReBfvuh=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:39:54 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Wang Rong <w_angrong@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vhost/vdpa: Add MSI translation tables to iommu for
software-managed MSI
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 5:13 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:55:50AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:00 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 06:19:12PM +0800, Wang Rong wrote:
> > > > > From: Rong Wang <w_angrong@....com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Once enable iommu domain for one device, the MSI
> > > > > translation tables have to be there for software-managed MSI.
> > > > > Otherwise, platform with software-managed MSI without an
> > > > > irq bypass function, can not get a correct memory write event
> > > > > from pcie, will not get irqs.
> > > > > The solution is to obtain the MSI phy base address from
> > > > > iommu reserved region, and set it to iommu MSI cookie,
> > > > > then translation tables will be created while request irq.
> > > > >
> > > > > Change log
> > > > > ----------
> > > > >
> > > > > v1->v2:
> > > > > - add resv iotlb to avoid overlap mapping.
> > > > > v2->v3:
> > > > > - there is no need to export the iommu symbol anymore.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rong Wang <w_angrong@....com>
> > > >
> > > > There's in interest to keep extending vhost iotlb -
> > > > we should just switch over to iommufd which supports
> > > > this already.
> > >
> > > IOMMUFD is good but VFIO supports this before IOMMUFD. This patch
> > > makes vDPA run without a backporting of full IOMMUFD in the production
> > > environment. I think it's worth.
> > >
> > > If you worry about the extension, we can just use the vhost iotlb
> > > existing facility to do this.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > Btw, Wang Rong,
> >
> > It looks that Cindy does have the bandwidth in working for IOMMUFD support.
>
> I think you mean she does not.
Yes, you are right.
Thanks
>
> > Do you have the will to do that?
> >
> > Thanks
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists