netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: marvell: prestera: allocate dummy net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zgb4sEmsiDkNtvJG@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 10:21:52 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
	quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com, kvalo@...nel.org, leon@...nel.org,
	dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: marvell: prestera: allocate dummy
 net_device dynamically

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 08:56:33AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > @@ -682,6 +690,7 @@ static void prestera_sdma_switch_fini(struct prestera_switch *sw)
> >  	prestera_sdma_tx_fini(sdma);
> >  	prestera_sdma_rx_fini(sdma);
> >  	dma_pool_destroy(sdma->desc_pool);
> > +	kfree(sdma->napi_dev);
> 
> Why kfree()? Let's use free_netdev() consistently, in case one day
> we have to undo something alloc_netdev_dummy() has done.

I should have used free_netdev() in fact. I will update.