[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ca681b5-4844-4199-8e8c-d5d0dd82ea86@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 10:19:40 +0800
From: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS" <virtualization@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] virtio-net: fix possible dim status unrecoverable
在 2024/3/28 下午6:34, Paolo Abeni 写道:
> On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 14:25 +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
>> When the dim worker is scheduled, if it fails to acquire the lock,
>> dim may not be able to return to the working state later.
>>
>> For example, the following single queue scenario:
>> 1. The dim worker of rxq0 is scheduled, and the dim status is
>> changed to DIM_APPLY_NEW_PROFILE;
>> 2. The ethtool command is holding rtnl lock;
>> 3. Since the rtnl lock is already held, virtnet_rx_dim_work fails
>> to acquire the lock and exits;
>>
>> Then, even if net_dim is invoked again, it cannot work because the
>> state is not restored to DIM_START_MEASURE.
>>
>> Patch has been tested on a VM with 16 NICs, 128 queues per NIC
>> (2kq total):
>> With dim enabled on all queues, there are many opportunities for
>> contention for RTNL lock, and this patch introduces no visible hotspots.
>> The dim performance is also stable.
>>
>> Fixes: 6208799553a8 ("virtio-net: support rx netdim")
>> Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> v1->v2:
>> - Update commit log. No functional changes.
>>
>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index c22d111..0ebe322 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -3563,8 +3563,10 @@ static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
>> int i, qnum, err;
>>
>> - if (!rtnl_trylock())
>> + if (!rtnl_trylock()) {
>> + schedule_work(&dim->work);
>> return;
> I'm really scared by this change. VMs are (increasingly) used to run
> containers orchestration, which in turns puts a lot of pressure on the
> RTNL lock. Any rtnl_trylock+ reschedule may hang for a very long time.
> Addressing this kind of issues later becomes _extremely_ painful, see:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231018154804.420823-1-atenart@kernel.org/
>
> I really think a different solution is needed. What about moving
> virtnet_send_command() under protection of a new mutex?
Daniel did additional work:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240328044715.266641-1-danielj@nvidia.com/
Use spin lock to protect ctrlq access, therefore, rtnl lock can be
removed in rx_dim_work,
which will make the problem non-existent.
Thanks,
Heng
>
> I understand it will complicate future hardening works around cvq, but
> really rtnl_trylock()/<spin/retry> is bad for the whole system.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists